|
INTERSTELLAR RIGHTS FOR HUMANITY |
||
|
Andrew Hennessey hereby makes the declaration that as an indigenous tabula rasa human on planet Earth, he has invented and created; indigenous human Interstellar Technologies, and Sciences and Arts and Technological Art sufficient to enable the Interstellar process that examines humanity to identify Humanity for Galactic legal purposes as a unique Interstellar species.Tabula rasa Humanity (born as blank slates) consigned to the dustbin by the alien cabal - as useless eaters to be composted as our allegedly retarded incapacity, is graceless and unillumined blah blah blah. For those of us who are human there is the certainty that cognitive issues provide us with tricks or treats ... for others, the hybrids and alien colonists - there are no such handicaps - no barriers to memories or processing. Theirs is a reality that incorporates thousands of years of instantly accessible skills and information. The tabula rasa theory is
probably half right - a human being is born with no data but does have
innate potential and attributes that will emerge and drive data acquisition,
analysis and data manipulation. http://www.duke.edu/~pk10/language/psych.htm Nature vs. Nurture: by Malia Knezek
-John Milton THE CONTROVERSY ' …Why do some children
build towers with blocks, cry when they scrape their knees, and shout,
"Choo-choo mine!" when a sibling takes away their favorite toy
train? Why are some children able to perform entire piano concertos or
master complex mathematical concepts, while others cannot even learn to
communicate in the normal way? In short, why do humans behave the way
they do? With the exception of identical twins, each new human being receives
a novel combination of genes divided Controversy does arise,
however, when one tries to examine the extent of genetic influence on
human behavior. Just how many of our abilities and shortcomings are innate
in nature, and how many are acquired through our interactions with the
environment? This debate has been going on for centuries, and popular
attitudes have varied greatly throughout this time. At one extreme, we
have John Locke's idea of
The criteria for being some sort of valid contactee tends to be more
satisfied if the person claiming to be in touch with superior
intelligences is actually innately and indigenously producing something
totally new and intelligent. You could say that there’s nothing new under any sun and the aliens
already have all this stuff and are selling it to us. Truth is though that sometimes home-grown and indigenous interstellar
science means more to the history and economic future of any race than
just acquiring some hand me down or an extortionate franchise from a
would-be overlord. If humans could become interstellar in their own right without hand me
downs they would perhaps acquire the legal right to be free of social and
political and industrial annexation and trading controls in some Galactic
Federal context. The Human Race could if it really tried, be an interstellar race with an
interstellar destiny with its own social and political independence. Monkeys we may be but in the words of Walt Disney’s Jungle Book .. ‘I’m the king of the swings yeah, the jungle VIP, I got to the top and I had to stop And that’s what’s troublin’ me Shoob dab doo, I wanna be like yoo hoo hoo I wanna walk like yoo Talk like yoo … Poor old Earth Monkey wanted the secret of the eternal fire of telepathic
commune and spirit plus a third eye network modem for massive downloads of
free knowledge and skills from his previous and more erudite and
unconstrained interstellar lifetimes. He was getting tired of making do with bananas and having people that
looked human do things he couldn’t keep up with. Human Beings, according to some United Nations experts are past their
sell-by date .. and also according to aliens are being superseded by next
years hybridised model. All we need to do is eat our toxins and give it
up. Humans are not really supposed to be capable of interstellar reality and
therefore need to be properly conquered and easily surpassed. Human’s though are easily capable of producing credible interstellar
stuff. Here are a few of my monkey efforts to advance Mankind. 1. GAME THEORY 2004AD In the middle 1950’s, mathematician and eventual Nobel Prize Winner
John Nash discovered a Game Theory strategy where nobody would come out
losing. Everybody wins something. e.g. "Two-person Cooperative
Games", Econometrica 21 (1953), 128–140.
This despite having had interludes where he was tuned into Men in Black
who claimed to be from Antarctica. His invention could be deemed a tactical game theory. The film ‘A Beautiful Mind’ documents his struggle for reality. Although meeting Men in Black from the arctic in my quest for reality I
subsequently developed a new kind of Game Theory strategy for complex
systems using the butterfly effect. In this scenario, somebody wins
everything. This could be deemed a strategic game theory because it deals
with information chaos in large complex systems. You could win wars with it, win elections with it and you could create
and emerge three different outcomes with it. It did attract a small amount of attention from some American political
think tank, but there was no consultation about any specific application. For example if you were running for President and wanted to conduct an
electoral campaign and needed to assess whether to overplay or underplay a
key issue in each state whilst conducting a state by state election
campaign – then this was the game theory for you. 2. ARTIFICIAL GENERAL INTELLIGENCE 1991AD My next contribution to Scientific advances for mankind was an operating
system and semantics that enabled executive robotic consciousness ..
allegedly a seemingly impossible pursuit – mainly because of things like
the Turing recursion paradox which is all about an infinity of things to
see and do for the robot without getting anything really meaningful out of
things. I solved that paradox. The game continues though – this next quote shows the magnitude of the
allegedly unsolved problem in AI that is generally recognised by hundreds
of thousands of scientists who spend millions of hours and billions of
dollars trying to solve the problem. I solved the problem. AGIRI -- the Artificial General Intelligence Research Institute “The
field of AI began with dreams of creating machines with human-level and
even superhuman intelligence. But over the years it has drifted into a
focus on "narrow AI" -- software programs that deal exclusively
with specific areas like chess, medical diagnosis, mathematics, vision or
robot arm control. These programs are very good at what they do, but they
lack the ability to generalize their knowledge across different domains,
as well the ability to reflect on themselves or create fundamental
innovations and insights. Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) has been
pushed into the margins of the AI discipline. We realize that AGI is a huge quest, in which success is far from
guaranteed. But, in the words of Sir Edmund Hilary (the first to ascend
Everest), "Never venture, never win." I also solved the problem of being unable to generalize over various domains too. The secret is in my specially created semantics and metaphysics. These are based on a natural and universal law. Also, instead of making endless references to endless labels and names in
the universe, I recognise
every event in the universe as being part of a limited and closed series
of transactions. The quality of each event and its exchanges can be
calibrated upon an octal arithmetic that has a finite and limited amount
of numbers. The amount of finite numbers used each time can be custom made for the
kind of system being modelled. Because it’s always a limited number of choices .. the computer
doesn’t have to run around the entire and infinite universe of options
before it makes its decisions. This semantic system also progresses the work of Nobel Prize winning
neuroscientist Gerald Edelmann beyond the Turing problem and its brick
wall as seen in cognitive research in Humans. e.g.
‘Bright Air, Brilliant Fire’, G M Edelmann, Penguin, 1994, ISBN
0-713-99096-1 There are some real advances possible in scientific research with this
system of semantics that has things divided up into three parts. In fact the solution to many different scientific paradoxes. Neither e.g. the Tavistock
Institute nor IBM took the matter up. 3. NEW PARTICLE PHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY
1991AD Yes the aliens have this stuff, but I have it too therefore it originated
from indigenous humanity on this planet – it’s not a hand me down.
It’s based on the law of Emergence .. that out of chaos emerges
structure. Of course, structure also recycles and breaks down by entropy,
but we always seem to just get that side of the coin and never emergence. This emergence has a force or weight of ether like water on a dam and by
spinning a magnet for free energy it’s like opening a sluice. Stuart Kauffman at the Santa Fe Institute showed that DNA emerges for
nothing out of a chaos of basic ingredients and then self regulates, and
Brian Goodwin blew Richard Dawkins’ slow ponderous Darwinian evolution
of the eye in Dawkins’ book ‘Climbing Mount Improbable’ out of the
water when he showed that the laws of chaos spontaneously manufactured
eyes or discarded them in his acetabularia model. The era of Darwin had been scientifically superseded from about 1990AD at
the Santa Fe Institute and other places doing massive computation and
chaos-based research. 19th Century Darwin’s definition of a ‘main frame’ would
have been an abacus. Emergence takes physics away from Einstein and Superstrings and places it
firmly in the ball park of Harmonics, turbulence, fluid dynamics etc all
the stuff that Tesla and Lord Kelvin were working on at the end of the 19th
Century. e.g. Kelvin’s Atomic Vortex Theory, 1901AD and Tesla’s Theory
of Environmental Energy. Ca.1930AD I also discovered a totally new way to see gravity … Isaac Newton’s
apple didn’t fall passively from the tree to the ground .. it was pushed
and then conveyed to the ground by a force I call compaction. The forces of newly emerging produce from the ether pushes in on us,
compacting us from all sides and is in turn broken down and regulated by
entropy. I had solved the particle wave duality paradox … as a particle was both
a wave and a particle at the same time .. in fact a particle was a
standing wave like a note bowed from the violin of the ether. It was compacted into rough shape by the pressure of other subatomic
particles emerging new from the ether around it. There were no billiard ball atoms and constant and similar looking
building bricks. Also, every particle was like a unique chaos fingerprint, a vortex or
weather system like the red spot on Jupiter, it was an organic thing that
could mutate. There was no Planck’s constant, therefore, that is no
constant superstructure within atoms .. everything was in truth marginally
deregulated and in constant flux .. there was no absolute speed of light,
no fixed quantum shells, everything was in flux. Each atomic process belonged to sets of similar objects and processes,
which shared common observed properties. By the use of such categories and classifications Russell and
Whitehead’s 1930’s Set Theory could now come into its own. Objects, Processes and Qualities of these classes of atoms could be
measured and calibrated. The relative proportions and ratios and distribution of its component
atoms could now be used to classify every object in any universe. I sketched the ideas for a starship that could translate itself at all
and any scale of magnitude from the matter of its origins into the matter
and energies of local materials by preserving its relative ratios in a
core datastore, which would then dictate and direct the design of the far
travelling rematerialising ship from new local materials. This star drive was not merely electrogravity, which propels ships like
little horses and carts up and down the mountains of gravity via goat
tracks of least resistance. The translation stardrive could enable a ship
to tunnel through these electrogravity realities like a submarine goes
through and under the mountainous waves. Potentially this was more like a direct long-range teleportation than a
long-range journey along a relatively winding track. I did hear of one contactee describe such a ship that could sustain
itself through dimensions and relatively vast scales of energies and
matter. Perhaps this kind of stardrive belonged to a very exclusive deep range
club that didn’t involve the Greys. 4. TRAWLER TECHNOLOGY. 2006AD I discovered that every thing or system or object or process in the
universe from atom to tree to star has three zones. For example, the human body is powered by will and driven by its core the
brain via its structure of organs and skeleton and delivers performance
and quality of application via the arms, hands and feet. Every thing in the universe can be interpreted as having three zones and
in each of these zones are the bits that maintain the inside stuff of the
zone and the bits that apply that zone to its external context. Technically each system therefore has 6 key processes that define its
performance and integrity. I had discovered 6 Keys Systems Theory. [2003] Everything, every process, everything that functions and every component
within every object that functions has 6 key attributes or classes of
attribute and could be endlessly broken down into 6 parts, 6 keys; atoms,
cars, corporations, empires, biological organisms, galaxies, information
systems, signals, politics. This meant that large amounts of information about these things could be
classified and accessed via their relationship to each of these 6 key
processes or 6 keys. It meant that this repeated division and redivision of six [called
heuristics] would enable some very specific aspects of any object or
system to be identified and manipulated. If this could be translated into a portable technology then Extra
Terrestrial analysis of; strategic and tactical issues, or economic
investments or even the use or misuse of specific media personalities
would make for a precise and surgical intervention in any conflict or
military industrial scenario. This last idea is a bit of a leap, as it would take a massive database,
an ‘artilect’ or artificial intellect to operate it and it would need
an operating system that worked. Only Interstellar Corporations have those
things and I was here marooned on planet Earth listening to the worlds top
humanesque computer scientists endlessly recycle the same primitive
problems and technical failures. If this portable box I call a Trawler – (because of its capacity to
fish for deep data) - could be developed then the Extra Terrestrial race
in possession of it would be able to hack the Universe. 6 Keys systems theory is literally the keys to the material universe and
all of its contents. Even if an ET race merely pretended they had an operational Trawler
device they might be able to buy some time in a stand off with a bully.
Their opponents would have to examine the possibility of surgical takeouts
on specific assets, some previously unidentified as such, whose absence
could cause critical long term damage to a war effort without creating too
much mess in the surrounding interstellar infrastructure or galactic
economy. An example of qualitative research with a Trawler might turn up the
following in some interstellar context. For example in world war 2 on planet Earth, the German Luftwaffe bomber
that conducted the blitz on London was the Junkers JU88 and the alloy for
its engines contained a specific and rare metal that came from a German
mine in Australia. It changed its company registration details to Danish
or neutral ownership during the war. That metal was Wolframite, and during World War 2 it continued to be
shipped from Australia to the Nazi aircraft factories in Europe under a
neutral Danish flag. Wolframite was critical to the Nazi war effort and by identifying that
mineral and the mine it came from, a surgical strike that merely closed
the mine would have saved many lives in London and Europe. Interstellar civilisations would similarly deploy their assets in a
trading infrastructure and the components of these could be identified
more easily with a Trawler. The Trawler would be able to calibrate its search around certain specific
social and economic markers within an alien civilisation and from there an
artificial intellect could conduct profiling searches in the alien
Internet. The success of the Trawler would depend on its capacity to decrypt and
its ability to scan through shielding as supplied by its ET manufacturers. It could also work without the data we call language labels just by
looking at the distribution and activity and magnitude of energy exchanges
within their nested contexts. Once it started analysing the energy landscape with its; energy mountains
and cascades, transactions, investments, nesting, bridges, channels and
bottlenecks etc it would become possible to look at the relevance of some
of these investments to the greater context of the targeted society. These searches could be based on patterns of asset use, rates and
quantities of transfer between assets and their relative distribution.
Also, these assets could be associated with other socio economic and
military industrial structures within alien society and the magnitude and
or efficiency of the relationship could be a factor in placing its
relative importance to the whole. This is not the same kind of thing that is done with human intelligence
searches by humans on planet Earth. This search can be conducted in an alien database without understanding
the language or what things are called. For Trawler technology to be successful though, it would have to have a
large database of Imperial examples worked out beforehand that tie the
bits and pieces of an alien civilisation into previously measured
experiences with comparable technologies and technical specifications and
expectations. Any large and successful Galactic civilisation that has been round the
block a few times will have lots of this kind of data. By pooling this
information in the light of experience, these facts and figures will
enable totally unknown opponents and aggressors to be more accurately
assessed and more efficiently countered. Trawler Technology is not for Humanity on planet Earth, but it is one of
planet Earth’s contributions to an ongoing state of peace and security
in the Galaxy. Whereas everybody has a handle on happy robots, game theories and the
physics of reality, I suspect that Trawler Technology has never been
before seen. One thing’s for sure; everybody will want a Trawler device. |