HARMONIC CONTINUUM
THEORY.
PART
1. The old Paradigm.
It
would be fair to say that for the last hundred years, the human race has not
made any progress in the understanding of life and the Cosmos. Even copious
technology, which has greatly improved our understanding of the particle
physics that runs it all, has remained paradox ridden and incomplete. Thus far,
it is only by the greatest bit of luck that
the misled thankfully haven't succeeded in completing a black hole of
any magnitude in the lab.
Holywood
and the film industry has ceaselessly presented The Teutonic eggheads of post
World War II and made the Germanic contribution to science legendary. The
popular understanding of the mad scientific genius always has a German accent:
Einstein, Von Neumann, Heisenberg, Max Plank, etc. The only problem with this
myth of supremacy is that it has led us all nowhere for 70 years and is a load
of old baloney.
Einstein
and the establishment agreed in the late 1930's, in Copenhagen, that having a
paradox at the heart of physics was a good idea. Also, that the speed of light
should be fixed at a constant and that there was no ether or grainy bits in
space that would hold travelling photons up. Logically therefore the sky should
be white at night noted Olbers c.1920.
A
paradox suggested the establishment. Olbers Paradox.
An
entire century of human evolution has been lost by that nonsense.
Did
you know that the reason why the sky isn't white at night is a real paradox and
mystery? Because if Albert Einstein and cronies have rationally decided, that
there is nothing holding the passage of light through the cosmos up (i.e. that
there is no ether), then they would also expect the sky to be completely white
at night. The dark night sky disproves Einstein’s Theory of Relativity.
We
know the sky is black at night and that was the paradox noted by Olbers in
1920. Something is holding up the light to make it dark, and that whole paradox
is really proof for the ether that Einstein and the establishment wanted so
badly to ignore.
Of
course people will answer to Olbers that the Universe has been measured finite,
but how could we ever rationally say that when we have never measured the Dark
Matter within it.
We
build TV's and computers or any other black box, yet our understanding of the
vital processes at the heart of it all is actually less than nothing. If we
look closely, and we have to (because no one wants to admit it to you), there
are paradoxes not just at the heart of physics, but at the heart of everything
we think we know about the universe.
Our
logic isn't logical, [Goedel], our
philosophy of arithmetic is about nothing in particular, [Frege] and our
physics is an ignorant tragedy. [Superstring theory]. The odd thing is that the
thirty or so really crippling paradoxes are all really the very same one, but
just dressed up differently in the specialist language of each discipline. That
is, every paradox could be solved by taking into account its interaction with
the bigger picture. The very opposite of how every scientist today has been
trained to think.
Coming
back to physics and cosmology, (because we have to. . .well somebody does
anyway) our particle physics today is a gargantuan monstrosity of mathematical
nonsense that will never produce any results. It’s called super-strings, and at
the heart of all the real problems of 21st century academic physics, is the
in-built failure of Einstein and his theories of relativity.
How
much irrational nonsense and social engineering has been written on the back of
the problems of uncertainty posed by the mathematical nonsense and paradoxes in
physics? The nonsense of quantum physics is being used to justify all sort of
impulsive and irrational social leaps and experiments. Whole theories of human behavior and the
occult are based upon these foundations of sand.
Let’s
be clear, though, about what I'm saying.
Yes, there is plenty of scientific evidence and results to talk about
particles and show what particles can do. But current quantum physics and
super-strings is a model or a construct.
It is a vehicle on which to drive forward; it is a frame on which to hang the experimental results. There
are better frames and better vehicles. However, what quality of vehicle are we talking about when we talk of
quantum physics? The answer has to be a unicycle.
In
comparison, the amount of Rolls Royce genius that has been repetitively ignored
for at least the past hundred years by the establishment, has been criminal. We
had Maxwell in the 19th Century, Tesla and Brown in the early 20th Century and
De Palma in the 1990's. Also, a whole gaggle of others; all these people knew
how physics really worked and how to tap into the really free energy of the
cosmos in addition to interplanetary space travel. Of course, this was all
against the wishes of the Einsteinian theorists and the oil companies.
But,
if you thought that the problem was a modern one, well have I got news for you.
Having developed and rediscovered Tesla’s Theory
of Environmental Energy [1938] and how free energy works, I studied the
principles of philosophy of science, and developed a new scientific world-view.
I found ways to argue in philosophy that could educate modern scientific
thinkers away from the paradoxes by using the same jargon that they use, but in
a different way.
I
was trying to get them to adopt a ‘holistic’ approach. Boy, what a waste of ten
years that was. The cosmos runs on harmony, resonance, musical scales, and the
mathematics of wave theory and ‘eightness’. It is definitely not a coincidence
that the Chinese I CHING symbolism is made up like it is, ancient mankind
allegedly flew ships through the sky called Vimanas. It is exactly the same
symbolism used inside every modern computer chip renamed as Boolean Arithmetic.
So,
there is the look of real antiquity about this truth, but it gets worse. Having been an avid follower of the Chaos
Theory (coming out of the Santa Fe Institute), I noticed that one of the
fundamental natural laws that seemed to underpin the cosmos (that nobody wanted
to talk about), was ‘emergence’.
That
‘order emerges out of chaos’ was being proved on the Santa Fe computers, and
some conspiracy buffs will tell you that it is also part of the motto of a very
high Masonic degree. This was the one connection no scientist was trained to
ever want, yet it was the key to understanding everything: unity, Tesla, time-travel, anti-gravity,
possibly even the soul and eternal life.
It was the very cornerstone of reality.
More
shocks lay ahead for me, however.
Taking a rummage through a dusty old cupboard in the Edinburgh
Theosophical Society one day, I found this bundle of yellowed paper (dated
1920) with instructions to destroy in the event of the owner’s death. It was an esoteric secret school Illuminati
Degree. I opened up the bundle with glee, but discovered to my horror (well, it
was for my ego), that in those pages was the theory that I thought I had
invented; the theory of ‘emergence,’ ‘threeness’ and harmony, based on Hindu
and Sanskrit writings dating back 10,000
BCE. [as; ‘Logos, Outpourings and Vehicles’. Vol 1 Secret Doctrine,
Blavatsky, HP, 1875, Madras]
As
we all know, there is nothing new about real truth, but the Illuminati Schools
have been teaching the reality of science, free energy and emergence to people
for millennia. The Platonic school’s
harmonic math briefly emerged into art schools during the renaissance,
but it never made it into science and technology. If it had, we could all have
been flying anti-gravity machines in the 16th century---much like the technical
designs of the Vimanas of the ancient Hindus, which were preserved in caves
written on palm leaves. Presumably, after some cataclysmic Earth change
thousands of years BC, that may have sunk what we think of as Atlantis and
given the Sphinx 12000 year old water erosion..
The
same theories written in Sanskrit have been re-invented time and time again by
bright human scholars. The recent spate of really, (obviously) good theorists
have come to grief looking for peer acceptance and publication. People like;
Peter Plichta [1997] 'prime number code', Ray Tomes [1992] 'Tomes harmonic
theory on redshift], Frank Searle [1999], Townsend Brown [1935], 'bifield-Brown
effect', and myself have tried till we're blue in the face to get scientists to
see sense and save the world with sanity, as did Lord Kelvin in 1903 with his
atomic vortex theory and other late 19th Century contemporaries such as; Boyle
[Gas Laws], Hooper's etheric field theory of 1903.
Thankfully
an American bookdeal obtained through the Internet from the spirit of free
enterprise published a version of my 'free energy' paper in a 'conspiracist
anthology' called 'The Universal Seduction .com' in 2003 CE.
Many
of us today are beguiled by the technological advances of genetics and
computers, maybe even satisfied that the pace of medicine is just about holding
back the tide of new super bugs. Many
of us are happy to listen to the great mathematician, Stephen Hawkings,
speculating badly that the unity will come to physics in twenty years. We all know that’s a pretty safe thing to
say because we may have been hit by Earth changes before then, and any cronies
perpetuating the science conspiracy,
will have passed over before then, anyway.
The
reality of the matter, though, is that the crop of modern science gurus like
Hawking and Dawkins do not give us the truth. Whether they know the truth and
are hiding it from us is another story.
If they were hiding this, they would be criminals of civilization -
stifling the young minds that could save our planet.
However,
maybe the basis of the matter is that they are merely victims of bad peer and
non-rigorous peer review.
The
new theorists like Plichta, Tomes, Brown,
and myself who have come
forward, can argue the most profound and real scientific arguments, using the
highest form of scientific language and analysis and are willing to be proved
wrong. We satisfy all the criteria for good science: simplicity and prediction,
which is more than can be said for refuted theories like the ‘big bang’ and
super-strings.
Where,
oh where, did we hear that reality is so difficult that it needs incredible
hyper-dimensional mathematics, and ivy towers to even have the time and
inclination to contemplate the complexities?
It is just not true that reality is intuitively complex. Thousands of
scientists, millions of hours, billions of dollars have been spent, yet no
results, no progress has been forthcoming---just a beckoning dark age and a
good mortgage. Those big black holes in our current scientific understanding
are starting to be filled by dark gods and black magic.
A
dark age of barbarism and insanity is only a few scientific confessions away.
Publicly,
we may yet see some scientific scholars in the magical robes of alchemy and
they might cite Newton as their paragon of magic and gravity. He was also an alchemist and Rosicrucian,
but certainly not one to have published all of the truth or to have been
permitted to do so.
The
force of gravity I shall later contend is a simplistic observation.
The
other problem with making change is that science is really a masculine preserve
and that left-brained emperor is hardly going to concede that he is not the
proprietor of reason. But that's another problem, that of proving things like
UFOs and free energy to so called skeptics is a nonsensical pursuit.
The
ONE rational contradiction needed to any skeptical premise of imagination has
been furnished one thousand times and all to no avail.
One
could present pseudo-skeptics with a 'falsification' or proof and they would
not change their point of view. In
science, the very cornerstone doctrine of reasoning (again by a Germanic
philosopher scientist called Karl Popper), would logically concede that you
only need one proof and then the skeptic must concede the possibility that
their skepticism doesn’t universally hold..
All
over the world, proofs are being presented and nobody wants to learn of
it. Perhaps in secret, the world’s top
Masonic scientists could save the world with free energy, using some of the
most ancient knowledge on this planet. Perhaps those scientists who tried to make this difference, but died young,
(like Bruce De Palma in 1992 C.E) will one day be acknowledged as heroes. Let
us hope that there is still a tiny fraction of time left for the masses on this
planet to know truth. Let us also pray
that this ‘Alien Master Plan’ to cull the ignorant, helpless and poisoned in
mind and body fails. In any event, the secret of time-travel,
dimensional-travel and all the free energy you can use may be simply garnered
with the spin of a magnetic disk. But be forewarned, every attempt carries an
alienating death warning.
If
you want to scientifically test the basis of telepathy, harmony of the spheres
and the very nature of the cosmos, get two acoustic guitars, tune them up and set
them so that they face each other. Strum one guitar and you will notice that
the other guitar starts to resonate in harmony.
If
you want to understand how it is that free energy is only a phone call
away, think of a hydroelectric dam. The
universe is full of ether and subatomic particles all buzzing about and
bubbling out all over the place. They are very chaotic and it is a natural law
that out of that swirling vortex, order emerges. Just like the red spot on the planet Jupiter.
The
planetary super storm on Jupiter has a red eye that looks solid and
stable. In fact, the particles of the
cosmos are all like eyes in the energy storms of the cosmos. All of that
activity exerts its own pressure on the fabric of the cosmos, and like the
waters of a hydroelectric dam, they have a pressure against the wall.
When
we spin an electromagnetic plate to get free energy as De Palma, Brown and
numerous others have done, it is like
opening up a sluice in the dam and the weight of energy pours through, driving
our turbine.
If
you have ever wondered what it would be like to solve the most difficult
paradox ever known to the minds of the world’s greatest physicists, let’s give
it a try and see how easy this is. Scientists cannot figure out whether a
particle is a particle or a wave. As
far as they are concerned, it cannot be both.
It
is both, however. But, the real
question is: What is a particle? Is it
a billiard ball or do we need a more holistic explanation that says that every
particle is part of something much bigger?
That
insight would actually help solve the paradox and stop silly physicists from
saying that particles are telepathic. There is little danger that scientists -
who are trained reductionists, will make that connection, though. Particles
really emerge like notes out of the endlessly playing chaotic symphony.
The
chaotic vortex of small and big particles that make up the cosmos is constant,
like an orchestra playing an eternal symphony. But, it is an orchestra that we
cannot technically see, thus far. Out
of this orchestral symphony, ordered notes continually emerge, like the red
spot of Jupiter:- order emerging out of chaos, waves of particles - like waves
of music.
Particles
are waves and it is only a paradox if we think that a particle is a finished article,
something that is a completely isolated end product, like a snooker ball. A
reductionist scientist today only sees the snooker ball.
The
reality is that a particle is like a musical note that is continually being
played by a violinist, and it can change and become something else under the
right conditions.
Nicola
Tesla also saw this, and his Theory of
Environmental Energy was
confiscated by the U.S. government. Our snooker ball could become a tennis
ball.
Outrageous
idea, but really very organic and sensible. All of today’s experimental results
in physics have foundations in ‘threeness’, e.g RGB Quarks, and ‘eightness’,
e.g. 'Pauli Exclusion' and have the arithmetic of harmony. But that never seems
to lead to a simpler understanding of the Cosmos. We seem to keep getting
sillier with our mathematics, never down to basic harmony and chaos. It’s always something bizarre and complex.
The
scientific mindset of reductionism strips away all the necessary complexities and leads us away from holistic systems; it gives us snooker
balls and little disintegrated components that we can pick up with
tweezers. Of course, this has led to paradoxes everywhere simply
because things are actually so interconnected. Observed processes under
reductionism are yielding contradictions because of their interdependence on
more remote systems beyond the field of view of the reductionists blinkers.
The
contradiction is that reductionism never made a simple job out of particle
physics. Our very understanding of time and the cosmos is, in reality, nonsense.
Science fiction programs like Star Trek serve to reinforce the idea that
we have to get past the impossible ‘faster than light barrier’ to traverse the
cosmos.
“If
you’re at warp Factor 10, you can’t go any faster”, and as chief engineer Scott
said to Captain Kirk – “you cannot change the laws of physics” – at least as
far as current science is concerned.
This is all baloney as well. An understanding of the time, matter and
gravity concepts (on the lips of abductees and 'Black Ops' scientists like Dr.
Michael Wolf and the basics of the Secret Science) show us that gravity, time
and mass are all one and the same. In all likelihood, it is easier to travel
through time and dimensions by spinning a magnetic disk, than it is to travel
between distant galaxies with never to be found 'dilithium crystals' of Star
Trek.
One
of the main features of interstellar travel (that was seemingly disclosed by
ETs), is that they pull their destination to themselves. This doesn't sound
like Star Trek does it? This is how it probably works: by taking their ships
out of gravity (and therefore time) and the physical conditions of this
dimension (by getting on a high mountain top of free energy), their destination seems to swirl closer towards
them because distant things look closer together, i.e. city blocks look very
close together from Earth’s orbit. Then, they then drop more easily onto their
destination, with the minimum of physical adjustment, but using the maximum of
free energy.
Right
now on this planet - and make no mistake about it - what passes for science is
a perpetuated conspiracy of ignorance.
Everywhere
on the Internet, the glories of technology are being propounded; even the
completion of the Human Genome Project wasn't an act of analytical genius. It
was simply a case of funding enough monkeys, typewriters and petri dishes.
Science
itself has turned into an irrefutable priesthood with popes like Hawking at its
head---doctrines that cannot be overturned and reality that cannot be published.
As the 21st Century progresses, more and more minds are being led into
darkness.
Scholastic
education at universities, schools and colleges discourage individual
brilliance and teach people to become conduits of vast amounts of data.
[Outcomes Based Education]. Unfortunately, most of that data is junk.
Philosophy departments are either closed down or converted into schools of
atheism or nihilism with Spartan ethics and elitist overtones. Everywhere, the
skills of analysis are being discouraged and disowned, while the plans of the
social engineers (that steer the new generations to their doom) take shape.
Like
deja vu, we have seen these plans unfold before during the industrial
revolution and ‘dark Satanic mills’ of England. There, in vile working conditions,
the slaves of capitalism were chained to the production and assembly
lines, no one ever knowing how it all
worked. It’s the same in the 21st Century.
The capital of truth and information falls into ‘total
compartmentalization’, without anyone ever knowing the whole truth.
Today,
science is used against the masses; it has become the slave of politics and
multi-nationals. To avoid introducing a tax on industrial carbon emissions in
the 1990's CE, one group of scientists, working for the UK Thatcher Government,
pronounced that there was no such thing as global warming.
To
save money on cattle feed production, scientists pronounced it safe to lower
the sterilization temperatures of the feed process this, as a prelude to the
CJD epidemic of ‘Mad Cow Disease’.
Now
the Nazi theories of eugenics once again come to the fore publicly, as the
newly cracked genetic codes of the population offer multinationals more ways to
tax and exploit the population through insurance, health, education and social
engineering scams.
Unfortunately,
the same shortsighted science that gave us bad disconnected physics, will be
applied to the science of genetics. With what results? Everything will be taken
out of context, and at some point, someone will invent a new paradox to explain
why seemingly ordinary genes can make extraordinary people and why seemingly
extraordinary genes make ordinary people.
Scientists
like Hawking continue to promote Darwin, probably knowing it’s all a lie. E.g
Schiffler's Horns Paradox in Hawking field of mathematical topology is actually
the absolute mathematical proof of universal chaos and non-linearity yet chaos
concepts in Hawking universe are neither professed or espoused.
Richard
Dawkins’ book, ‘Climbing Mount
Improbable,’ tells us of the
slow painstaking climb involved in the evolution of the complex organ of the
eye and how the human race acquired it after millions of years of painstaking
evolution.
His
Cambridge compatriot biologist, Brian Goodwin, however, tells us that the eye
is an organ which can spontaneously evolve or devolve at will (in a flash in an
instant), and has models to prove that. In other words, the eye emerges
spontaneously to fill the need; it doesn't take millions of years of
improbability and slow Darwinism.
Now
we have to depend on NASA and the petrol engine to save the day.
But!
Sorry folks, there isn't enough petrol around to get all 6 billion people off
this planet.
As
we have already discovered, the technologies and scientific theories to save
the human race have been around and taught secretly here for millennia in
Gnostic schools. E.g Fibonacci chaos art in the renaissance art schools by e.g.
Da Vinci.
If
science cannot mend its ways and serve truth, we should at least have the
knowledge that science, as a philosophical practice is dead. As a tool of rational inquiry, it is
redundant. In its place, a new order is born, not of the scientist, but of the technologist. For it is
technology that will control, deaden and manipulate the originality and truths
of the future. E.g Aldous Huxley's 'Brave New World' with clone factories.
Technology and the technologists will simply become the controlling tentacles
of the governments and multinational corporations supplying consumers in
laissez faire and wasteful planned obsolescence in their products.
Ironically,
perhaps it will be the survivors, the peoples of the future, who will begin
again by making their own measurements of the monoliths of antiquity, the eons
old ziggurats. But a better scenario
than that would be a setting where we were not so habitually programmed to sit
in front of the television day after day, etc.
Instead, we would realize that nature itself is an encyclopedia of
wisdom from which to draw analogies that will solve many problems.
The
power of analogy can help us model the unknown. For example, It can give us a real clarity on eternity and
dimensions. In the heavy dark masses of matter and time that we wade through
(temporarily divorced from the eternal wellspring of energies and youth), we
are like deep-sea divers at the bottom of a weighty gravity ocean. Our life
force comes in packets of food, like bottled oxygen; our movements are slow and
cumbersome, our outlook, murky.
If
we run out of food or oxygen, we run out of life force.
However,
by analogy, eternity, dry land without the cumbersome diving suit of our
physical body, must have sunshine, oxygen and life force aplenty, without
restriction. The power of analogy can save the world; it can solve problems and
break down communication barriers, yet it is not a taught discipline.
The
population is not being allowed to analyze or analogize, or basically, to
think. The ‘science conspiracy’ has wasted the potential of generations of
young able minds by enacting in their own self interest, and from within their
own comfort zone, their entrenched carelessness and lack of vision. Worse than that, it has exposed the human
race to the possibility of extinction.
PART
2 The new Paradigm.
Whatever
truths come upon us; whatever future we have in store, we must gear ourselves
up for a change of perspective. We have
been exposed to the nonsense of science for such a long time, that it will be a
hard effort to replace what “we think
we know” with reality. The 'Conspiracy'
against chaos theory has seen to that.
A spook once said at the meeting of a society
allegedly pledged to
compare philosophy, religion and science that
relativism was the
enemy. Yet it is only by the power of analogy that we
can reshape
our world.
I wish to assert that our solar system is a mini
model, a microcosm
of the greater superstructure in the bigger cosmos.
I have reasons for saying this – as our sun and
planets conform to
harmonic principles that are somewhat similar to
atomic behaviour.
Of course the establishment has sat on harmonic
principles for
centuries not wishing the human race to escape.
The big Masonic motto `order and chaos' the 33rd
degree is a dead
giveaway that chaos science is the second ordering
principle in the
Cosmos – for as we have known for millennia and not told
– order
emerges for free out of chaos causing fusion and free
lunches.
Also at the heart of the matter amongst the
transitional elements of
a transitional planet in a tertiary cluster of
recycled stardust
there emerged life almost spontaneously by the non-Darwinic
law of
Emergence – a gift of chaos – a free lunch.
The ease of emergence of self-assembling DNA has been
wholly or
partially modelled by; Goodwin, Kauffman and Langton.
e.g.
[www.santafe.edu] `self assembling autocatalytic
polymers'.
In our solar system, the nine or twelve planets
circle the Sun at
harmonic intervals with their distribution of
elements tending to be
the most diverse in the centre of the chain of
planets at planet
Earth, non-metallic to the exterior fringe, heavier
metallic towards
the star, and mirror in many ways the periodic table
of elements.
Complexity and Life is always in the middle – at the
heart of all
energy or chemical interactions.
In the central transitional elements of the periodic
table of
chemical elements, exactly where Earth is in this
analogy, complex
interactions in both our biochemistry and the
chemical elements of
our solar system can be sustained by a
self-regulating equilibrium.
On the one side the entropy we know – on the other
side the free
emergence that we are banned from knowing.
In the centre of the traditional periodic table of
chemistry's
square arrangement of chemical elements are the
transitional
elements, and also iron and carbon upon which
facilitative platform
biological life is based.
In the centre of the solar system we have planet
Earth home to
biological carbon and iron based life taking up
diverse chemical
themes whilst noble gases accrue in Jupiter and
Saturn and the more
metallic planets are parked closer to the sun.
By a law of mass and ratios it is no random chance
that the planets
are so aligned, for as the elements of chemistry have
harmonic
signatures, distributions and properties, so have the
planetary
orbits and the tendencies of the planetary geology.
Our solar system therefore looks like the periodic
table of
chemistry – I posit, but it doesn't stop there, for
so does the
galaxy.
The new 2005 chemical galaxy periodic table
conforming to Newland's
1884 Law of Octaves shows the elements arranged by
harmonic
intervals spiralling out from the centre like the
archetypal spiral
galaxy each lined up at different harmonics.
It was Rae Tomes in 1992 who spotted from
calculations in redshift
that the stars and galaxies move apart from one
another at harmonic
intervals.
The cosmos therefore is a harmonic based chaos
system. `Order and
Chaos' the watchword of a secret society pledged to
stifle the truth.
Chaos structures such as the vortex – a spiral
weather system
performing harmonic mathematics in scales as small as
the subatomic
ether to as large as the supercluster show that the
cosmos is based
on the rules of harmony and chaos.
The chaos spiral or vortex of the `chemical galaxy'
could very well
be the model for the archetypal atom which can
facilitate no more
than an octet of eight electrons in a shell [Pauli
Exclusion
Principle].
Every where we look in the microcosm, we can begin to
see the
macrocosm – very much `as above, so below'.
Another free gift of chaos is free energy or
emergence.
Also noted as a rewarming after the Big Bang and a rewarming
after
quantum particles tear away from one another, the
Unruh Effect
illustrates that the chaos law of emergence supplies
the material we
can see with the substance of the ether that we
cannot. When we tear
away the particle or mass - the top of the fire
hydrant from its
locality we release the powers that supply it.
Particles are watery harmonic 3D swirls in the
turbulence of ether –
they are not isolated billiard balls and when they
are scooped out,
nature abhors a vacuum and fills it for free. [Unruh
Effect]
Such fluid and particulate turbulence have been noted
in the
flamelike properties of electromagnetic discharges.
For as fire
burns in air and oxygen following air turbulence – so
too is the
effect of etheric turbulence on travelling particles
in an
electromagnetic discharge – producing fire in the
atmosphere of the
ether.
Chaos and turbulence models at all scales show that
the universe is
unified with itself and is a chaos and fluid system
operating on
harmonic principles.
From the many diverse analogies that can be derived
from `as above,
so below' I would like to make the assertion that the
superstructure
of our own cosmic bubble in the greater cosmic foam
conforms to the
structural analogy of the solar system. In
particular, our solar
system.
Superclusters tend to form helices and spirals like
the harmonic
ingredients of DNA so to take the analogy of the
solar system
further, let superclusters in the cosmos be
equivalent to biological
life on planet earth.
An arithmetic array that subtracts rows and columns
of recycling 1-
13 that comprise all possible harmonic intervals on
the scale
produces helical DNA patterns called `the loom of
Maya'.
Helices are common to harmonics and harmonics are
common to the
ether and particles.
In this analogy, each biological lifeform is a
supercluster on the
planets surface.
The structure, geography and distribution of
biological life on
planet Earth can be used as an analogy like this
because the Earth
itself is an effect of a harmonic distribution in
both a physical
and chemical sense.
By also using an anthropocentric analogy we can
further suggest that
some rainforest canopies of biology/DNA – our
superclusters - have
sandwich layers of primary and secondary supercluster
elements and
properties, whilst some have tertiary qualities and
lifeforms like
the elements of the milky way and our own cluster.
We can say that intelligent as we know it life is
anthropoid and it
is a tertiary product.
We can assert that anthropoid life is relatively rare
in comparison
to e.g. phylum insecta.
It may be for instance in Cosmic life that the
insectoid formula is
prevalent more than the anthropomorphic.
In nature in Earth, this formula holds, whilst
bacterial and viral
life is in even greater abundance.
It would follow that anthropomorphic life and
relativity is rare in
our cosmic bubble and perhaps other bubbles too.
By using the structural model of the Earth as our
bubble and the
distribution of DNA like the helical patterns of the
superclusters
themselves we can predict that they tend to be
distributed around a
big planetary sphere or bubble in which is dense low
frequency
material.
There will be some `biological'
life-bearing/constellations and
clusters inside the geology and core of the
supercluster bubble, but
these may not be life as we know it. Perhaps taking
the inference of
a dark underworld in need of light or energy.
With superclusters arraigned around the periphery of
the cosmic
bubble on the surface of the sphere, there would be a
central sun,
the light of God holding our planet cosmic bubble in
place, and
almost certainly side by side in a harmonic pattern
would be a whole
solar system of adjacent planes or planet bubbles to
which we are
adjoined. Perhaps some containing supercluster forms
and biology and
life as we would recognise it.
This analogy would suggest that the Cosmos and the
Cosmic foam is a
vast place held together by the bright lifegiving
love of God – at
the very least the physical lifeforce that drives the
ecosystem of
superclusters and is in it and which binds every form
together in
the light.
Using the organic analogy further, knowing what we
know about the
suns output and global warming – it may be that the
life force of
the beings in the supercluster coated bubble will be
driven to the
challenge of growth and spiritual and material
evolution in some
future epoch – to collaborate to travel the vast
distances between
the next cosmic portal and bubble beyond the little
set of bubbles
in our local solar system cosmos.
An upcoming publication by I. Fuentes-Schuller and R.
B. Mann on
quantum entanglement will appear in Physical Review
Letters 2005.
It shows amongst other things that Quantum
entanglement research
proves that acceleration of related or entangled
particles from
their origins creates a `thermal bath'. In my words,
movement
between related particles tears the subatomic ether
that supports and
feeds the particles – causing i.e. a 'thermal bath'
or my words,
free energy.
There was a thermal bath after the Big Bang and there
is a thermal
bath at Quantum level today's physicists and
cosmologists are
literally bathing in free energy.
From the `Perimeter Institute for Theoretical
Physics.' Called,
`Alice falls into a black hole: Acceleration and
quantum entanglement'
`What would happen to their entanglement if Alice
fell into a black
hole and Bob stayed safely outside? We can model this
situation by
considering Alice to be stationary and Rob (formerly
Bob) to be
uniformly accelerated with respect to Alice. We found
that although
the entanglement between them is reduced due to Rob's
acceleration,
it remains nonzero as long as Rob's acceleration is
not infinite.
It has long been known that an accelerated observer
detects a
thermal bath of particles whereas an observer at rest
sees only a
vacuum.
Known as the Unruh effect, it is this that causes the
degradation
in the entanglement measured by Alice and Rob.'
The tearing apart of related and entangled particles
across a field
produces a `thermal bath'.
Hennessey's Harmonic Continuum Theory
www.whale.to\b\hennessey_b1.html predicts that:
particles are continually emerging standing waves
emerging as a
weather system at the top of a pyramid of relativity
- energy that
is fed into maintaining the particle in its locality
is bled,
released and generated by tearing the particles from
their locality.
The tearing effect produces the `thermal bath' effect
known in
quantum entanglement.
Two spinning magnets therefore would release a great
deal of free
energy because the field relationship between upper
and lower plate
atoms is being promoted by high voltages, which when
torqued by the
physical device produce the thermal bath of the Unruh
Effect.
I think this paper and or fact of the Unruh effect in
quantum
entanglement is corroborated as a universal law in
the macrocosm by
the fact that the Universe has been found to have
been rewarming
itself after the gravitational tearing and motion of
the Big Bang.
The Unruh Effect as a universal law for matter and
gravity and time
would substantiate/corroborate the free energy ideas
of; Faraday
Tesla, Townsend Brown, Frank Searle, Bruce De Palma
etc ...
In free energy devices - the thermal bath idea is
tapped into by
the rotating mechanics of the device.
Big Bang researchers have recently conceded to a
major flaw in the
theory in that the Cosmos has been measured to have
reheated itself
by obtaining free energy from somewhere.
This idea, I postulate, is the same `Unruh Effect' at
massive scales
of gravitational entanglement and tearing as is being
observed in the
quantum microcosm with its entanglement and tearing.
Massive movement
and tearing of the macrocosm has produced the same
thermal bath
previously observed at a quantum level. The Cosmos
has been reheated
after the big bang. This Cosmic rewarming is an Unruh
effect the
operation of a universal physical law on a massive
scale. It is Free
Energy.
Academics have been sitting on the proof for free
energy .. right
there already published in plain view, though they
apparently don't
have any reason to believe that particles are
externally supplied and
refreshed.
Superstrings and Einstein do not cover the law of
Emergence and total
interconnection within a fluid environment. Theirs is
the pristine
billiard ball that cannot be a particle and a wave at
the same time.
The bit they don't get is that all particles are fed
and continually
supplied harmonic standing waves like galaxies or
vortices in the eye of an ether storm. This ether
energy
continually supplies, feeds and augments by the chaos
law of
emergence the particulate form with fresh energy.
That's why spinning two magnets tears away the
relationships between
the particles in the upper plate from the particles
in the lower
plate – creating a rewarming or thermal bath or Unruh
Effect.
The recent `chemical galaxy' vortex model for the
periodic table of
chemical elements is construed as a harmonic chaos
form because the
elements align themselves by harmonic intervals. This
fact was known
as far back as Newland's Theory of Octaves in 1884
CE.
Lord Kelvin's Vortex Theory of Ether and Atoms in
1901 CE was a
theory born in fluid dynamics and turbulence and at
least 100 years
ahead of Einstein. We now in 2005 CE have a vortex
theory of atoms
for the periodic table.
The hidden extras in reality that physicists
allegedly cannot grasp
is that a particle is both a wave and a particle at
the same time
because the particle is intimately connected with and
derived within
the fluids of the ether. A particle is a standing
wave made out of
harmonic folds of ether, a storm system like the red spot
in the eye
of Jupiter.
Move a particle or mass by breaking its field
relativity away from
the pyramid of energies that continually feed it and
free energy to
the value of the energy in the core of the particle
will pour through
the gap. This is called the Unruh Effect … we just
call it free
energy.
There is
a long list of ‘fringe heretics’ no longer with us to guide us on this new
journey into the future possibilities of Interstellar space.
E.g. 1.
William R. Lyne, 'Nikola Tesla, Occult Ether Physics', pub. Creatopia Productions, ISBN 0-9637467-6-6
p67.
‘Tesla
emphasised that his concept of alternating current,
AC, using
rotating magnetic fields involved new principles
rather
than refinements of pre-existing work ...
But was
Tesla the first to conceive of a rotating magnetic
field? The answer is no.
The first
workable rotating magnetic field similar to Tesla's 1882 revelation was
conceived three years before him by Walter Baily, who demonstrated the
principle before the Physical Society of London on June 28, 1879 ...
Two years
later, at the Paris Exposition of 1881, came the
work of
Marcel Deprez, who calculated "that a rotating magnetic
field
could be produced ... by energising electromagnets with two
Out-of-step
AC currents."
A
question that remains unanswered was whether or not Tesla
knew of
Baily's work. It is quite possible that
he had read
Baily's
paper, although no one at the time, including Baily,
comprehended
the importance of the research or understood how to turn it into a practical
invention ... pp. 24-25’
According
to Tesla's lecture prepared for the Institute of Immigrant Welfare (May. 12,
1938), his "Dynamic Theory of Gravity" was one of two far reaching
discoveries, which he "...worked out in all details", in the years
1893 and 1894. The 1938 lecture was less than five years before his death.
In his
1938 lecture, Tesla said he was progressing with the work, and hoped to give
the theory to the world "very soon", so it was clearly his intent to
"give it to the world", as soon as he had completed his secret
developments.
The
"two great discoveries" to which Tesla referred, were:
1. The
Dynamic Theory of Gravity - which assumed a field of force which accounts for
the motions of bodies in space; assumption of this field of force dispenses
with the concept of space curvature (ala Einstein); the ether has an
indispensable function in the phenomena (of universal gravity, inertia,
momentum, and movement of heavenly bodies, as well as all atomic and molecular
matter); and,
2.
Environmental Energy - the Discovery of a new physical Truth: there is no
energy in matter other than that received from the environment.
The usual
Tesla birthday announcement - on his 79th birthday (1935), Tesla made a brief reference to the theory
saying it applies to molecules and atoms as well as to the largest heavenly
bodies, and to "...all matter in the universe in any phase of its
existence from its very formation to its ultimate disintegration".
In an
article, "Man's Greatest Achievement", Tesla outlined his Dynamic
Theory of Gravity in poetic form (as paraphrased
by me
[Lyne]):
·
That the luminiferous ether fills
all space.
·
That the ether is acted upon by the
life-giving creative force.
·
That the ether is thrown into
"infinitesimal whirls".
("micro helices") at
near the speed of light, becoming
ponderable matter.
·
That when the force subsides and
motion ceases, matter reverts to the ether (a form of "atomic decay")
That man
can harness these processes, to:
·
Precipitate matter from the ether.
·
Create whatever he wants with the
matter and energy derived.
·
Alter the Earth's size.
·
Control Earth's seasons (weather
control).
·
Guide Earth's path through the
Universe, like a space ship
·
Cause the collisions of planets to
produce new suns and stars, heat, and light.
·
Originate and develop life in
infinite forms.
Tesla was
referring to unlimited energy, derived from the environment.
Some of
Telsa's unusual conceptualisation of the ether had been nonetheless expounded
piecemeal, in his preceding 1890's lectures. He later railed against the limited and erroneous theories
of Maxwell, Hertz, Lorentz, and Einstein.
Tesla's
ether was neither the "solid" ether with the "tenuity of
steel" of Maxwell and Hertz, nor the half-hearted, entrained, gaseous
ether of Lorentz. Tesla's ether
consisted of "carriers immersed in an insulating fluid", which filled
all space. Its properties varied according to relative movement, the presence
of mass, and the electric and magnetic environment.
Tesla's
ether was rigidified by rapidly varying electrostatic forces, and was thereby
involved in gravitational effects, inertia, and momentum, especially in the
space near Earth, since, as explained by Tesla, the Earth is "...like a
charged metal ball moving through space", which creates the enormous, rapidly
varying electrostatic forces which diminish in intensity with the square of the
distance from Earth, just like gravity. Since the direction of propagation
radiates from the Earth, the so-called force of gravity is toward Earth.’
William
R. Lyne, ‘Occult Ether Physics’, ISBN 0-9637467-6-6
In
manufacturing Tripartite Essentialism [Hennessey 1991], the Octal Arithmetic is
generated Boolean-fashion around the validity of 2 systems in
exchange/relationship through a common medium.
[A basic
exchange in 3 dimensions with 3 components at time t1]
There
are, essentially, eight Logically Real models of that transaction at any given
time t1, and, 64 at time t2.
A
Logically Complete and closed set of 64 can describe all the varieties of
logically real activity and exchange within the three dimensional Cosmos
between t1 and t2. The language [T]
This
closed set of 64 'activity states' is analogous to the activity relationships
within the periodic table of Chemistry by Fajan’s Rules. i.e. The language [HX]
Chemical Assembly Language.
Current
beliefs held by the 20th century Science paradigm have it that atoms
of the same kind are 'absolutely' equivalent, subject to the paradoxes of
Superstrings and Quantum Physics e.g. the ‘collapsing wave paradox’ or, the
'particle-wave duality' paradox.
i.e. is a
particle, a particle or a wave, because although it appears to be both in the
field as it were, when one tries to nail it down in a laboratory using a belief
system called ‘scientific reductionism’ it cannot be both at once.
However,
these 20th Century theories do not perform in their 11 or 26
dimensions e.g. Superstrings, and in terms of their internal consistency,
cannot unify the forces they represent with the labels they possess e.g. gravity and electroweak.
However, certain
of the mechanics of the atomic processes that have been observed and
quantified, possess consistent mechanics from which predictions in new data
models can be made.
These
observed properties, perform around certain fundamentals of reality. [e.g. 3-part
quark, or 8 electrons per shell in the ‘Pauli exclusion principle’, or ‘Regge
resonances’ or harmonic representations of the periodic table of chemistry e.g.
Newland’s ‘Law of Octaves 1864’.
With the
famous gas law Physicist Lord Kelvin attempting to introduce a theory of ether
in 1901 based on his knowledge of fluid and turbulence, the scene therefore was
certainly established to deploy constructs around the harmony of the spheres.
Isaac
Newton’s law of planetary motion indicated orbits of harmonic interlude around
the star, and indeed Rae Tomes in 1991 published Tomes Harmonic Theory based on
analysis of Cosmological red-shift data that demonstrated that there were
harmonic components amongst the expanding starfields.
In Paris
in 1992, University research using chaos theory demonstrated that the perceived
regularity of planetary motion and harmony was a metaphysical illusion as the
minute microscopic deviances within planetary gravimetric interaction and
displacement could be more precisely accounted for using chaos theory.
The
current Physics Theories extemporising from the facts do not perform well
enough to attain a final physical theory without reference to paradox or
extremely dimensional, complicated, yet strangely inadequate mathematics.
e.g. Heisenberg’s
‘principle of non-locality’
The
reality is however, that the three dimensions of this Cosmos; all the matter
and all space and all its time in which we exist, from photons to stars – i.e.
its energy, matter and time, is absolutely non-linear and upheld as a field of
emergent energy.
[cf.
Mathematical Chaos]
An
archetypal property of Chaotic Systems is their capacity to emerge new
'ordered' states. e.g. from the weather systems of Jupiter emerges the 'Red
Spot' - the spot is inseparable from the weather system.
It is
hypothesised that from the sub-atomic energies of the Cosmos, emerges a
particle in like manner to the red
spot.
The
continuous nature of the particles existence is upheld in its continuous and
complex relationship to its sub-atomic patronage.
The
mathematical process which describes this particle relativity can only be, at
its most basic, a relativity of eightness derived from three dimensions of
space and 1 of time - [which maximises the efficacy of Occam's Razor on 20th
Century physics.].
The
observed particles appear isolated to our methods of observation, but the most
apt analogy would be that the sub-atomic background is a continuously bowed
violin - and the emerged note - which is the particle - is in a state invisible
to our methods of observation – i.e. We cannot 'see' musical sounds, but the
relativity of the invisible sound to the visible musical instrument is
consistent.
A
Particle is in effect a three-dimensional standing wave - in a different state
from its continuous source of supply from the emergent properties of the ether.
All the
mathematics of wave theory, resonance and harmony would apply to its
physicality and would fit with the ‘eightness’ and harmonic tendencies in the
observed data. e.g. Fourier and Laplace mathematical transformations.
The
Quantum ‘particle-wave duality’ which is currently a physically unexplained
paradox, now has a rational model that makes the laboratory observations a
realistic event.
Taking
the implications of non-linearity further, it can be said that atoms belong to
observed groups with similarly classified properties. [Class Atomism :
Hennessey 1991], and that no two similarly classified 'atoms' are absolutely
identical due to their Chaos Ontology.
This
theory predicts that a particle is
analogous to a note, and that on a Cosmic scale the qualities and properties
within and between Classes of atoms or notes will vary in a fluidic way.
e.g.
relative textures, tones, attack and decay [cf. Music in vivo] with each
particle/note will mean that some matter can be relatively more 'audible' in
the local Cosmic energy mix.
i.e. Some
matter may not co-operate with expectations i.e. Have a different perspective
to the relative observer in time and space.
This
matter, at some higher harmonic interval, may be able to drift through other
matter - and that would hold whether the states were relatively similar e.g.
metals, or different.
These
properties are dependent on the state of the invisible sub-atomic weather
system from which the particle emerges. e.g. 'transparent' iron could pass
through dense iron. [See below]
There
would, apart from an expected migration of electrons, be also a migration of
protons and even neutrons, as the intrusion of larger packets of emergent
energy, inconsistent to the local equilibrium of material interaction drew upon
the local ‘a priori’ atomic reservoir by Fajan’s Rules, to create new
particles.
Fajan in
essence said that Big atoms donate to small atoms across
A common
medium. The same transference criteria applies to other field behaviour
definitions such as Ohm’s Law and Voltages in electricity, and in osmosis in
Biology, and transference in Lewin’s Field theory in Psychology. i.e. A to B, through some common C, where in
reality, depending on the scale of the transaction or donation, C would be of
varying impedance.
The sizes
of the ‘new particles’ would be dictated by the atoms within their point of
entry and also by the size of the unfilled energy packet.
A big
emerged energy packet [EP] of size2 at time1, newly intruding into local
smaller atoms might produce noticeable material degradation and inconsistency
in atomic behaviour and would create new and larger atoms as the energies from
the new packet augmented the locality.
Whereas,
a big emerged energy packet of size1 amongst larger atoms at time1 might have a
less noticeable effect.
The
intrusion of new energies into this cosmos is a continual process and has been
noted in observations of dark matter.
At time
2, after intrusion and diffusion however, in all cases, there is more matter
and more energy to repair any entropic degradation.
This
constant creation and augmentation, though, does upset the medieval applecart
as it contradicts Isaac Newton’s Law that states that ‘matter can neither be
created or destroyed’.
The
transference gradients and the ‘a priori’ size of the atoms and their relative
capacity to contribute from within their atomic environment – which may consist of other atomic types in
aggregate – would influence the sizes and types of new particles discovered.
There may
be 3 classes of these atomic properties;
1. Dense
Matter which would be relatively sub-atomically stable
2.
Transparent Matter which would be relatively sub-atomically unstable.
3. Opaque
Matter - a relative state between 1 & 2
20th
Century science appears to have designated its perceptions of this reality by
using counter-intuitive neologia, however.
I shall
designate that our current Cosmos is Dense Matter [DM], and that some place in
and around and in between our reality that we cannot see supplies its energy needs by emergence. This
supplier is Transparent Matter [TM] [is called by science 'dark matter'] and that we may be able to detect this activity by
taking note of certain hybrid interstitial states of material that may have
unusual and unexpected properties in any given context. [e.g. the well
documented 'particle zoo' of theoretical physicists.] This hybrid, interstitial
type of matter, analagousIy, wild unregulated matter I shall designate Opaque
Matter. [OM].
As the
physical Cosmos has no absolutely fixed properties, due to its ontological
non-linearity and innate chaos, the status of 20th Century
‘constants’ must be challenged – e.g. it is predicted that the speed of light
[Einstein’s ‘c’ ] is not an absolute Universal constant, nor would the relative
behaviour of time be constant and ontologically homogenous either.
Similarly,
Planck's Constant, the idea that electron shells are a fixed distance apart can
be challenged by this new atomic model.
The
pressures from the continual intrusion of newly emerging energy from the ether
into and around atomic packets creates new electrons, protons and neutrons.
This pressure is driven by local cosmic chaos and is variable, and consequently
the distance ratios between the electron shells in atoms are variable, not
fixed as Planck suggested. Distances between electron shells are dictated by
the underpinning frequency of vibration and emergence in the local ether. This
pressure Compresses the atom into shape, a three dimensional standing wave with
resonant shells continually supplied and created from events in the emergent
ether outside the nucleus.
Emergence
from Transparent Matter drives the continual formation and reformation of new
electrons, protons and neutrons, in Dense Matter, offsetting local entropy.
(Dense
matter as I call it is classified by 20th century science as ‘Light
matter’ and ‘Transparent matter’ as I call it is designated by 20th
century science as ‘Dark matter’.
The
intuitive approach for the purposes of public construction of this new paradigm
however, would have it that we in this material Universe are in the Dark and
that light should emerge from the Logos, or other bubbles of foam in our
Universe, to illuminate and substantiate our material reality.
As this
emergent matter clearly upholds the grosser fabric of our own reality, I would
require that we would appreciate that it is the free donation of Light from the
architecture of the Universe, or indeed some greater Architect than we are that
keeps our fabric intact.
I would
humbly submit therefore that the Cosmos we are currently agreeing to measure be
denoted ‘dark matter’ and that the infinite amounts of immeasurable light and
energies continually reported variously as arbitrary and big percentages within
the papers of ‘New Scientist’ and ‘Scientific American’ (within the pretext of
statistical and logically irrational Bayesian reasoning) be denoted Light
matter.)
In the
meantime, and for the purposes of this discourse, I shall denote the 3 material
classes of energy and matter as Transparent [TM], Opaque [OM] and Dense [DM],
the latter being our reality.
In
conclusion - a new Paradigm is possible which has no pathologies and paradoxes
and which completely revises the beliefs of the current Cosmologists in Physics
and Maths.
It is not
a waste of physics research funding to re-use older experimental data on better
and more functional models. That after all was the basis and theory of rational
scientific practise as outlined by e.g. Karl Popper in his 1963 publication of
‘Conjectures and Refutations’.
The
famous two atomic clock experiment created by the Physics establishment to
substantiate Einstein’s relativity, in truth, substantiates the alternate
hypothesis of time as a radiated effect of mass and gravity.
With two
allegedly identical atomic clocks, set at identical times, one on the ground
and one in a very high altitude jet aircraft, it was found that the high
altitude clock had experienced less time when the jet aircraft landed and
became relative to the ground.
The
empirical results and data from that experiment although used upon the
constructs of Einsteinian relativity, when used on the Tesla and Hennessey
model substantiate the idea that time is a field effect of mass. The very high
altitude aircraft under conditions of lesser gravity than e.g. 9.81 ms was
also, by this new model, travelling through different atomic conditions for
time.
Atoms -
[mass etc] are the emerged product of other chaotic 'sub-atomic
particles/energies' and are themselves dynamic standing waves.
They
produce a time wave in relation to the observer but this time and its
time-scales are entirely local, and somewhat arbitrarily imposed.
Mass will
also produce harmonic images or dimensions of itself, not necessarily as
discernible to the observer as the passage of time. e.g. resonant material
impressions of dense matter perhaps enlivened by emergent energies and matter –
ideologies that we may designate as Mythic or Theological e.g. Heavens, Planes,
Spheres, Continuum, Nirvana etc
Time is a
wave propagated through the relativity of local mass - and a 'time-scale' may
be 'imposed' in relation to some standard of lowest common denominator - LCD -
of mass - common to all observed systems. We choose the photon - but make the
mistake in assuming that the photon is a Universally Constant LCD for mass and
time.
Much in
the same way that water is the LCD and standard for life on Earth - we know
that it does not flow about from place to place at the same rate.
i.e. The
cycling of water on this planet is not 'universally constant' or consistent due
to gradients, climate, weather, metabolism, rate of uptake etc and by the same
token, the cycling of photons through the Cosmos cannot be constant.
Olbers, a
contemporary of Albert Einstein pointed that fact out c.a. 1920 to Einstein,
suggesting that if there was no ether as Einstein claimed and asserted to
manufacture his ‘artificial constant ‘c’’, then the sky would be white at
night, for there would be nothing to hold up and impede all the photons that
there were on their journey to our eyes at night. i.e. the sky at night would
be white.
The only
argument to bolster Einstein and contradict Olbers was the invented notion that
our Universe was finite. Given the academic contradictions to even that that
suggest 80% is immeasurable dark matter and that 80% of Infinity is classically
zero, and that statistics used like this are totally irrational and
meaningless. The absurd claim that the Universe is finite seems to get
constantly pushed under the coffee table at the CERN Institute in Switzerland
during break-time discussions of who’s who in the world of chocolate
fireguards.
Humanity,
however, utilises a photon-based interpretation of time - i.e. it is what
we 'see'. Though there may be a better standard particle that we haven't
detected yet.
Given
that a body of cosmic mass or rock is a also a lump of dynamic standing waves -
an analogy for the rock would be a serenade by a symphony.
A
spinning mass that creates the
observed Lens-Thirring effect using
Earth as a model, would distort the relativity of space-time in relation to the
observer.
If
space-time relativity is the hearing this symphony the Lense-Thirring effect in
relation to time and gravity as it appears could be modelled using a hifi speaker
sitting on a turntable. If the table was still - there would be no disruption
of the observed relativity of sound to a hearing listener at time1 and
locality1- but if the turntable was set in motion – appreciation of sound waves
e.g. 'time and gravity' would be disrupted by inconsistencies as Einstein
predicted.
Although
disagreeing with Einstein, as did Tesla and others, the data for the Einstein
model, in this case also, would illustrate a case for the distortion of time
observations and also of the ontological linearity of time within such time
field measurements.
The
chaotic and non-linear aspects of the material Universe and its behaviour would
point to time as being a variable field that may experience gradients of
impedance along its lines of transmission.
i.e. A to
B through C where C is the common medium of e.g. ether
Two
parallel plates of equal size and mass, one spinning clockwise and the other
counter-clockwise with a massive potential difference in Volts between them
would disrupt the field and wave relativity in the gap between the plates.
There, the integrity of the structure and mechanics of; gravity, time and
electromagnetic wave relativity would be compromised.
The
matter and space-time fabric between the two plates is rather like a physical
dam, behind which is the subatomic reservoir of the ether.
The
sub-atomic reservoir has a natural pressure, caused by the energy of the
sub-atomic 'waters' pushing out and creating the 'concrete' atoms. This is
called the law of emergence.
Emergence
was studied at the Santa Fe Institute and discovered to be contravening the
second law of thermodynamics within the context of performance within
biological systems by Chris Langton.
[Levy S,
‘Artificial Life’ pub. Penguin 1993, ISBN 0-14-023105-6]
There the
biological models intimated that both entropy and emergence were in
collaboration to produce virtually automatic self-regulation within the
processes of Life e.g. Kauffman’s research models on autocatalytic polymer
evolution. [Levy S]
Emergence,
the constant input of new energy constructs into that which is observable
causing constant construction, deconstruction and reconstruction, suggests a
non-static and non-fixed atomic model.
With the
study of half-life atomic decay part of an examination of entropy, it would
suggest therefore that a relative ‘particle zoo’ of new looking particle
constructs would be observed by physics researchers.
This has
indeed been the case as research into Superstrings has entered a surreal
mathematical unfalsifiability as new and more challenging permutations of
energy chaos are entered into the linear mathematical descriptions that one
day, if sufficient computing and time and abundant money were supplied would,
no doubt, start to look like an
enormous fractal map in the bigger picture.
In
mathematical topology, the 'pathological' form known as 'Schifflers Horns'
displays a 'natural and healthy' truth - that the Cosmos is physically
non-linear.
In the
alleged pathogen - the 'perfect circle' has become deformed to a homeomorph
that appears to break rules and be paradoxical by demonstrating fractal
properties.
In
reality, there is no pathogenicity or paradox with this topology - because;
There is
no absolutely perfect circle delineated in any physical reality; from the
mathematically unsatisfying imperfection of PI to the fractal nature of any
physical rendering of the circle, whether electronically or more physically.
Unfortunately,
the Paradox called Schiffler’s Horns has been discarded from some University
mathematical textbooks.
e.g.
Concise Encyclopaedia of Mathematics, pub. CRC Press, London, NY, Washington
DC, 1999, Weisstein EW ed. P1597, cites
a ‘Schiffler Point’ but no ‘Schiffler Horns’.
The most
perfect line Mankind can draw whether electronically or more 'physically' has a
close-up edge resembling the coastline of Norway [i.e. Fractal].
Matter
[the dam] is a product of sub-atomic activity and emergence.
The two
spinning plates and ultra high voltage are opening a sluice gate like a turbine
in the 'concrete' of the dam - and the energy being forced through the
electromagnetic hole drives the matter of the dam/world into a state of high
energy.
These
plates negate the properties of the 'concrete' in that area, and the water or
‘energies’ push through the new artificial equilibrium caused by this process -
generating an excess of energy.
For
people living inside and part of the concrete [dense matter] of the dam - that
may be a good thing - hotter concrete.
The
amount of excess energy which becomes available is directly related to the
mechanics/size of the 'sluice gate'
The
amount of excess energy which becomes available is directly related to the
mechanics/magnitude of the 'sluice gate'.
Spinning plates of high voltage - create a potential difference between
the Earth and the 'sub atomic reservoir' and at some point the bubbling free energy emerging from the reservoir
of the sub atomic cosmos would be pushed down the gradient through the
'electromagnetic sluice' created by the spinning/rotating fields.
This
theory fully explains the behaviour of the practical apparatus of Faraday and DePalma as detailed below by
Richard Walters for The People Magazine / Energy/New Ideas section:
Subtitle:
A promising new alternative energy source, neglected in the U.S., advances in
the Far East.
‘Physicist
Bruce DePalma has a 100 kilowatt generator, which he invented, sitting in his
garage. It could power his whole house, but if he turns it on, the government
may confiscate it. Harvard educated DePalma, who taught physics at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology for 15 years, claims that his electrical
generator can provide cheap, inexhaustible, self sustaining and non polluting
source of energy, using principles that flout conventional physics and are
still not fully understood. His N machine, as it is called, is said to release
the "free energy" latent in the space all around us.
DePalma
views his device as an innovation that could help to end the world's dangerous
dependence on finite supplies of oil, gas, and other polluting fossil based
fuels.
The
DePalma generator is essentially a simple magnetised flywheel, i.e. a
magnetised cylindrical conductor rotating at high speed with the help of a
motor. His astonishing claim is that the present versions of the N machine can
generate up to five times more power than it consumes. This, of course, defies
the basic law of the conservation of energy, which says that the output of
energy cannot be more than the input. Most physicists simply refuse to look at
DePalma's findings and dismiss his theories out of hand.
Yet
"proof of principle" for his invention was apparently provided when a
large N machine, dubbed the Sunburst, was built in 1978 in Santa Barbara
California. The Sunburst machine was independently tested by Dr. Robert
Kincheloe, professor emeritus of electrical engineering at Stanford University.
In his 1986 report (presented to the Society for Scientific Exploration, San
Francisco, 6/21/86), Kincheloe noted that the drag of the rotating magnetised
gyroscope is only 13 to 20 percent of a conventional generator operating at an
ideal 100 percent efficiency, the DePalma N machine could produce electricity
at around 500 percent efficiency.
In
Kincheloe's cautious summary: "DePalma may have been right in that there
is indeed a situation here whereby energy is being obtained from a previously
unknown and unexplained source. This is a conclusion that most scientists and
engineers would reject out of hand as being a violation of accepted laws of
physics and if true has incredible implications".
DePalma
described his N machine and outlined a theory to explain its workings in a
paper, "On the Possibility of Extraction of Electrical Energy Directly
From Space", published in the British science journal, Speculations in
Science and Technology (Sept. 1990, Vol. 13 No 4). So far, the scientific
establishment either has ignored DePalma's controversial claims or remains
unaware of them.
No one
has ever obtained a patent for an N machine in the U.S., although in the San
Francisco area alone, there are some 200 patent applications relating to such
devices. The U.S. Patent office automatically denies a patent to any gizmo
which purports to produce more energy than it consumes, on the grounds that its
personnel are not equipped to evaluate such claims. DePalma is quick to point
out that the N machine is not a perpetual motion machine, that mythical
contraption long sought by frustrated inventors. "The perpetual motion
machine is only supposed to run itself. It could never put out five times more
power than is put into it. Perpetual motion schemes used conventional energy
sources, whereas the N machine is a new way of extracting energy from
space".
Tewari, a
senior engineer with India's Department of Atomic Energy-Nuclear Power
Corporation, also directs the Kaiga Project, India's largest atomic power
facility, in Karnataka. He freely acknowledges his dept to DePalma, who has
shared his experimental results with Tewari for many years. "One day man
will connect his apparatus to the very wheelwork of the universe... and the
very forces that motivate the planets in their orbits and cause them to rotate
will rotate his own machinery," predicted Nikola Tesla, the Croatian born
American electrical genius
"Electrical
engineering took a wrong turn 160 years ago," according to Tewari,
referring to English scientist Michael Faraday's pioneering work of the world's
first dynamo. In 1831, Faraday performed a series of experiments which led to
the modern electric induction generator, having two moving parts--a rotor and a
stator part. Faraday moved a wire near the pole of a magnet, producing an
electrical potential across the ends of the wire. This induction principle is
used in all the electrical generators we use today. And that's precisely what
Tewari means by a "wrong turn."
In that
same year, 1831, Faraday also performed a simple yet ingenious experiment with
a rotating magnetised conductor. The resulting phenomenon (free energy?) has
yet to be explained in terms of conventional scientific theory.
By
cementing a copper disc on top of a cylinder magnet, and rotating the magnet
and disc together, Faraday created an electrical potential. After pondering
this phenomenon for many years, he concluded that when a magnet is rotated, its
magnetic field remains stationary. Thus, he reasoned, the metal of the magnet
moves through its own field, and the relative motion is translated into
electrical potential.
Faraday's
experiments led him to the revolutionary conclusion that a magnetic field is a
property of space itself, not something attached to the magnet, which merely
serves to induce or evoke the field.
Known for
over 150 years, the ‘Faraday homopolar generator’, as his contraption is
called, has been viewed by a handful of visionary inventors as a basis for
evoking the free energy latent in space.
They see
it as the prototype for a generator capable of providing its own motive power
with additional energy to spare. When the world embraced Faraday's two piece
induction generator, whose drawbacks include mechanical friction and electrical
losses, the enormous potential of the Faraday homopolar generator was
abandoned, in the opinion of free-energy proponents.
Following
in Faraday's footsteps, DePalma in 1978 speculated that free energy could be
tapped from the matrix of space simply by magnetising a gyroscope. "I
reasoned that the metal of the magnetised gyroscope moving through its own
magnetic field, when rotated would produce an electrical potential between the
axle and the outer edge of the rotating magnetised flywheel," he explains.
This
insight led to his N machine, essentially a one piece rotating magnetised
flywheel, "Instead of having a rotor and a stator, as do conventional
generators, the n machine only has a rotor.
Half of
the flywheel is the north pole, the other half is the south pole. One
electrical contact is put on the axle, another contact is placed on the outer
edge of the gyroscope, and presto, electricity is taken directly out of the
magnet itself.
For 150
years after Faraday's controversial experiment, no one bothered to see whether
or not a rotating magnet generator would have to do the same amount of work as
a conventional induction generator in order to produce and identical power
output. Then, in 1978, the aforementioned Sunburst homopolar generator was
built. Tests determined that its output power greatly exceeded the input needed
to run the machine, that it was much more efficient that an induction
generator.
It would
generally mean that any free energy generated in massively larger than natural
and local amounts would create a disturbance.
The
problems inherent in a discontinuity of time and local matter may result in
both ‘anti-gravity and anti-mass’ effects and also ‘anti-time’ effects.
As in the
‘two atomic clocks’ experiment, a lessening of gravity and time may occur but
this time at a more significant scale of difference between apparatus and
relatively massive body of gravity. e.g. planet.
Each
moment in time in our 3D of space is unique and the past can never be recreated
- as the relative factors which comprise 'one moment' are infinitesmally
complex.
Therefore
the notion of going back in time and creating extreme problems is probably not
a physical prospect as we understand it, as all of our moments were continually
and uniquely replenished by emergence from transparent matter donation.
E.g. Time
travel is essentially faster than local mass travel.
We may
have certain parameters concerning an area of the past which we could visit,
but without specific knowledge of those massively complex and local and unique
processes of emergence it would be extremely difficult to overcome the inertia
written into that time space system in
a way which would again influence its overall and global evolution.
Forward
time travel, may not be precise enough to be technologically reliable – as
there would need to be an appreciation of the local fields and forces within
the materials and physics that we inhabit that could predict persistence in;
form and physical structure, molecular ratios in bodies of atomic aggregates
and the relative rates of; entropy, emergence and recombination of atomic
forces relative to our space-time.
Predicting
matter and energy parameters that may yet generally occur using such
computation and data available we may then create a temporal standing wave
inside an apparatus that structurally matched a predicted future of local
space-time. We may gather and collect or generate opaque matter to project into
the ‘local future’; i.e. congruent zones of transparent matter which would seed
and mould the evolution of the specifics within our future worlds. These 'strange attractors' of emerging opaque
matter that currently seed our reality may be sufficient to buffer any device
then subsequently introduced into this non-static envelope against any radical shift in the local
aggregates of opaque and transparent matter that would have influenced their
emergence gradient. It may be that relatively short jumps forward are possible
in some way in the expectation that those kinds of opaque and transparent
weather clouds we send are more static and durable in the winds of time than
the nature of the denser matter that we inhabit. There may however be drastic
demands on structural integrity even upon opaque matter at any random time. In
principle, therefore, given that we could empirically obtain opaque matter such
that it may create a more stable context which can facilitate the projection of
a more materially and temporally anchored, we may send a complex sensory device
from our own time zone possessing more operable properties that could return a
result whilst it was being substantiated by the opaque matter envelope.
The keys
to our future are the simple constructs that have given our life its most
immediate meaning. There is a University education within a country walk or
city park, had we but the self-confidence and self-respect to acquire it.
Tripartite
Essentialism is based upon the field
theory notion that there is a
continuous relation between
one system and
another through a common medium. i.e. A to B through some common C.
To add to this idea
is the notion of Emergence, where one
less sophisticated system by its more massive scales of chaos (ether) and in a
higher energy state feeds into and - [emerges] another more sophisticated
system in our time space.
To analogize using
the cycles observed in the material creation and recreation of stars. First
born or primary stars, are hot and e.g. blue, ultra-blue or indeed may not be
visible at all in some ways although they may be a substantial star relative to
some other part of another bubble universe in some other foam. New stars have a
short life and eventually go supernova and explode, releasing the products of
their cycle of physical synthesis as relatively more processed debris.
This because they are
newly emerged matter and have material that is comprised of unstable and
chaotic processes.
At the start of the
lifecycle of a star where aggregates of debris are impelled and constrained by
gravity to coalesce, an emergence/fusion reaction kicks in if there is a
sufficiently steep emergence gradient from transparent matter, to opaque matter
at the locality of the dense matter mass.
These highly temporal
and chaotic hot blue starfields are the product of emergent intrusion from a
physically transparent adjacent bubble in the foam and may incessantly froth
and explode and remain in a chaotic material state. However, they may
eventually emerge slightly cooler green stars by a process of fusion and by
merging such assets as green star materials together. The processes of gravity
and opaque matter gradients and local material relativity as eventually become
supplied for example may supply a bit of local temporal debris that could serve
as a seed around which to grow new emergence products.
Under these
conditions of fusion and emergence, cluster galaxies may form, fed into by a
central fusion reaction or ‘white hole’.
The spherical galaxy
may continue creating and recreating in a variable way, but that would not
automatically preclude the cessation of the conditions of emergence and
donation from the other bubble in the foam that was supplying it. The status of
supply of structures may drastically change in these unstable conditions. The
emergence gradient from the adjacent bubble having dropped off, core stars in
this galaxy may re-enter into adjacent chaos, whilst other stars on the
periphery of the sphere may drift off into this cosmos being excluded from the
new equilibrium between emergence and entropy around the changing white hole.
In other aspects of
our own universe bubble, energy may be passing outwith our universe down a
variable gradient into another bubble of variably lesser energy than our own.
[a black hole or an extended tear or worn patch of dissipation in our cosmos]
Dissipating energy
will create a tear or rift in local dense and opaque matter.
If a galaxy is in
this region the densest area of the galaxy may start to donate matter to the
other adjacent lower energy cosmic bubble down a concentration gradient.
This stream of local
matter will generate large amounts of mass and energy and will extract this
from local stars and galaxies.
This toll material
from the latter may also coalesce under great pressure being sometimes being
unable to exit simultaneously due to the variable gradient conditions imposed
by chaos.
Under these
circumstances where matter is queuing under pressure to exit this cosmic bubble
- such matter may react creating explosions from the source of the black hole.
E.g. the ejection of tertiary stars [as noted 2005]
Not necessarily at
the centre of a galaxy and not necessarily relatively black in terms of a
gravity well but may be small widely spread homogenous patches of relatively
smaller brown
pores comprised of
leaks in the matter and opaque matter ether of this bubble such that the fabric
of the bubble is more resilient to the local demands in this locality.
Rather like the
appearance of a more resistent but porous brown membrane spread over a galactic
cluster than a single black gravity well at the heart of a galaxy.
There may also be
instances of relatively brown holes at the heart of a galaxy.
This state of affairs
may come upon a relatively hot galaxy or it may come across a relatively cold
galaxy.
Eventually, such
compacted material of inappropriate relativity that was kept there by bubble
exit pressures – basically ‘suction’ - and now exchanging energy across very
steep differentials between new and unstable aggregates and under the new
conditions of re-emergence, and reconstruction from its original sources
explodes in a state of combustion releasing the stellar material.
If conditions for
black hole formation occur in a formerly fusion fed hot galaxy, there may be
green or yellow stars and star components produced that tend to be fusionable
which would further recombine.
This explosion may
also produce enough material for yellow or green stars that operate by
combustion and fission.
There may be however
green or yellow stars that are wholly endowed with processes of fusion.
If conditions for
black hole formation occur in a formerly fission fed cooler galaxy, then its
subsequent explosion could also produce both types of green and yellow stars
that use both fission and fusion.
End products of
fission etc are red, brown and black dwarves that eventually recreate the same
physical processes and conditions operating within a black hole that lead to a
further explosion and the creation of more sophisticated atomic (tertiary)
stardust.
The various
transitional states of a red dwarf to black suggest by analogy that the a black
hole entropy gradient could be observed in some forms as the ultimate phase in
their cycle.
It may be observed
from; the descriptions of black holes, white holes and emergence gradients
between cosmic states of transparent, opaque and dense matter, and, between
aggregates of our own dense matter atoms by using Fajan’s Rules, that the processes in the macrocosm look
identical to those in the microcosm except for the labeling notions that the
psychology of magnitude attaches to them.
The macrocosm by
analogy is a very slowly moving weather system, galaxies being the eyes of the
energy storm of chaotic emergence.
The subsequent;
migration of electrons, protons and neutrons, and the migration of and
recycling of fissionable and fusionable material between black and white holes
of relative opposite polarity and behaviour indicate that the simple
transaction model of A to B through some common C, i.e. from big scale to small scale across a
variable and changing common C is the
simple cornerstone principle of the Universe.
In keeping with the
idea that from some other context D some very large pocket of a different and
even greater magnitude of vast transparency or opaqueness could deliver a very
large newly formed pocket as a small bubble directly adjacent to our doorstep.
As suggested in the atomic scale model, protons, electrons and even neutrons
would migrate to fill it, then this process may give us a clue as to the
eternal creativity of this Multiverse that we all stay in to make new, baby
Universes.
Therein lies the
possibility of eternal recombination and strange new introductions to strange
new properties, for much of the material could come from bubbles adjacent that
possessed incredibly different material behaviour than the properties of matter
currently within our own Universe.
The key to all of
this analogy and modeling comes from the simple deductions about material
properties made by Fajan called Fajan’s Rules. i.e. big to small through common
medium.
In a book called
Physical Chemistry by GI SMITH.
A very large 15+
volume set on Physical Chemistry from a technical University bookset however,
only produced Soddy-Fajan in the index.
Although it was
clearly not from this planet in its editorial style, it was very clear that we
were not talking about a principle of transfer between high energy atoms to low
energy atoms.
It remains to be
seen, however, what Dr Soddy contributed to mankind along with Dr Rutherford
when in 1902 and 1903, they produced the theory of 'radioactivity'.
With Einstein's
'special theory of relativity' in 1905, Planck's 'Quantum Theory' in 1900, then
again in 1920, Bohr's atomic theory in 1913, by the time 1927 came around,
Heisenberg couldn't find out what particle anybody was referring to because
particles consistently refused to be found. 'The principle of indeterminacy.'
1927.
With Olbers c.1920's
claiming that something was holding them all up somewhere or the sky would be
white at night despite Michelson-Morley's 1887 dismissal of the theory of
ether, Einstein's 1905 pronouncement that light ossified at a constant called
'c' was still upheld in the 1930's and beyond. It was left to Schwarz and Green
in 1984 to lassoo Galileo's 1610 'sidereal messenger' utilizing the methods and
lexicon of Sir Isaac Newton's 'Opticks' written in 1704 with their theory of
'Superstrings'.
Green and Schwartz's
10 and 26 dimensional string theory, however, even today, continues to be
inconsistent in its own terms as a sufficient and logical explanation of 'everything'.
A veritable particle
zoo of arbitrary; size, naming, properties, behaviour of classes, ... 'even
conventional elementary particle physics has problems when it comes to mass.
The basic quantum mechanical rules give no reason as to why mass should be fixed
at all. There seems to be no rule why the mass of the electron, for example,
should not have a whole range of values. Moreover the various [superstrings]
symmetry schemes that were created over the last two decades work best when the
particle masses are zero. Peat DF, 'Superstrings', p.230.]
Symmetry and labeling
ensued that began even in its nomenclature to mimic the mathematics and
behaviour and torque of turbulence and chaos systems.
Linear mathematical
topology began to be twisted and pulled into 'twister networks' and 'spin
networks' [Peat DF, 'Superstrings' pub.1988, Cardinal, ISBN 0-7474-0583-2,
P.231-3].
By creating linear
algebraic models of particle behaviour in this turbulence, the mathematics of
particle relativity collapsed in places called 'gauge fields' between the
different particles.
There, the
'collapsing wave function' could only be solved in mathematical topology by adding a small appendage onto the ends
of the particle model like a 'weather vane'. E.g. Penrose. p.270. 'This
measurement problem has been around for 50 years now ..' p.271.
It remains to be
seen, however, in their study of the torus and twistor mathematical
topographical models, from e.g. 19th century mathematical topological algebra
of Grassmann HG and Clifford WK, if the superstrings mathematicians remember
the basic paradox of the torus presented by Schiffler.
Schiffler's Horns
paradox explains that a joined torus is impossible and that in fact, all is
non-linear chaos.
Green and Schwarz and
Gross's superstrings are built out of 'compactified' space that allegedly [Peat
p.289] compresses 10 and more torus 'structures' together. Also to make the
theory more workable, the edges of torus particles somehow need to connect. In
the mathematics of topological chaos, however, a structure such as a torus
doesn't logically and formally exist.
With even Green and
Schwarz now suggesting that some of these empirical dimensions are 'not really
dimensions at all', [Peat, p.320] the underlying assumptions and mathematical
models used to constrain chaotic empiricism into various regular torus layers
are being torn apart.
Superstrings,
therefore is a dark knotted unfalsifiable cul de sac of arbitrary labels and
fragmented mathematical models.
Chaos is evident
everywhere in particle energies, even from the linear mathematical
investigations, where a particle model performed better because it had
mathematical appendages.
These ideas are best
seen illustrated in another diagrammatic representation of Schiffler's Horns
that uses not a torus to illustrate fractal reality but a representation of a
triangle with appendages that are fractal growths upon it called a Köch Curve.
The side of the
triangle is only a point of view from another point of chaos somewhere in its
fractals in the same way that the incomplete torus of Schiffler is only a point
or curve from within the fractal relativities of the unjoined horns.
Schifflers Horns is a
direct refutation of the superstrings torus model.
Within the
empirically measured energies of the Cosmos there are many kinds of models and
data that would substantiate the ontology of chaos theory.
This would include a
universal and 'natural' objectivism and field theory of emergence based on
natural turbulence.
With energy emerging
and forcing its way into our 'dense matter', it was left to the most ancient
and rejected and presumably dejected school of scientific ghosts to rattle the
chains behind the brick walls of those lost academic cupboards of the 19th
Century.
Hooper WG, 'Aether
and Gravitation', pub.1903, Chapman and Hall, London, writes on page 63, '...
the atomicity of the aether has already been suggested by such scientists as
Clerk Maxwell, Lord Kelvin, Dr. Larmour, and Professors Lodge and J.J Thompson.
Clerk Maxwell, in an article on 'Action at a Distance', in collected works by
Niven, referring to the atomicity of the aether writes: 'its minute parts may
have rotatory as well as vibratory motions, and the axes of rotation may form
those lines of magnetic force which extend in unbroken continuity into regions
which no eye has seen'. 'Lord Kelvin, in several articles on 'Vortex Motion' in
the Philosophical Magazines of recent years (c.1903), has mathematically dealt
with the aether from the atomic standpoint, and has endeavoured to prove that
the aether medium is composed of vortex rings, but he was unable to come to any
mathematical conclusion.
Presumably the
earliest version of Microsoft Windows in 1903, called Microsoft Windmill had
been infected with the 'annelid worm' and had not lived up to the Great
Expectations needed for the massive chaos computations later required for
vortices in the sophisticated academic hallows of third millennium.
Of the field theory
that ties the aether together with the compression of continual emergence, the
1903 data, as available to Hooper enabled enough perspective to deduce for
physical properties what would later in the coming 100 years be seen to apply
to; Biology, Psychology, Chemistry, Cosmology and Time. etc. 'The law of
inverse squares which governs not only the law of gravitation attraction, but
also electricity and light, is equally applicable to the phenomena of heat, so
that the intensity of heat varies inversely as the square of the distance.
Thus, if we double the distance of any body from the source of the heat, the
amount of heat which such a body receives at the increased distance is
one-quarter of the heat compared with its original position. If the distance
were trebled, then the intensity of the heat would be reduced to one-ninth;
while if the distance were four times as great, the intensity of the heat would
only be one-sixteenth of what it would receive in its first position.' [Hooper
WG, 1903]
Across this chaotic
medium, the ether, spinning, rotating and vibrating, the waves of light and
electricity propagate. Attracted and deflected by larger gravitational masses.
Clerk Maxwell, in his paper on 'Action at a Distance' (collected works, by
Niven) writes, ' .. in its infinite continuity .. it extends unbroken from star
to star, and when a molecule of hydrogen vibrates in the Dog Star, the medium
receives the impulses of those vibrations, and transmits them to distant
worlds.' [Hooper WG, 1903, p.59.]
'Lord Kelvin in
giving an address to the British Association, 1901, on 'Clustering of
Gravitational Matter in any part of the Universe.' said: 'we are convinced with
our President (Professor Rucker) that Aether is matter. Aether we relegate to a
distinct species of matter which has inertia, rigidity, elasticity,
compressibility, but not heaviness.'
One hundred years
later, in the third millennium, Professor Higgs, the Scientific Community and
the 'Massless Vector Boson' that may solve the mathematical chaos of
superstrings and the quest for interplanetary resources, are still beyond help.
Faraday in [Hooper, 1903]
writes, (Exp. Res., vol. ii.); 'The view now stated of the composition of
matter would seem to involve the conclusion that matter fills all of space, or
at least all space to which Gravitation extends, including the sun and its
system, for Gravitation is a property of matter dependable on a certain force,
and it is this force which constitutes matter. Aether must also be matter.'
Hooper in 1903, an
objectivist to the end states 'for example, the laws which govern the light and
heat of the sun are the same which govern the light and heat of a candle or a
glow-worm; and the laws which govern a planet or world are the same as those
which govern an atom. Thus a planet or world, which is simply an agglomeration
of atoms, may reveal to us in its motions and laws, what are the motions and
laws which govern the atomic world.'
The laws of
attraction and repulsion as stated by Newton and the laws of planetary
attraction, conservation of momentum, for every action there is an equal and
opposite reaction etc, belong to an era bereft of massive computational
analysis.
Although numerous
empirical regimes from the famous Lord Kelvin and Boyle, whose gas laws and
studies of turbulence would have been major scientific advances had they a
version of Windows 95 - the main theories on aether, although very feasible
would be doomed without a driving and causal engine - the engine of emergence.
Factors noted by
[Hooper, 1903] as Centripetal and Centrifugal forces without a chaos-driven
emergence model to drive the 'antigravity' or out-throw of the centrifugal
forces being measured would fail in 'gravitational collapse'.
'Here, then, is
presented to us a kind of order of celestial phenomena for whose well-being and
effectual working the centripetal force or the attraction of gravitation cannot
possibly count. In their case another force is demanded which shall be the
exact complement and counterpart of the centripetal force. There needs
therefore a force, not an imagined one ... a force existing in each world just
like the attraction of gravitation, only the reverse of gravitation, a
repellant, repulsive force, acting in the reverse mode and way, to universal
attraction. This force must be governed by the same rules and laws that govern
centripetal force if it is to work in harmony with the same.' [Hooper, 1903,
p.31.]
Beyond, Kelvin's
ideas, though was the ['Spherical Vortex Atom Phil. Trans, 1894] of Professor
Hill in Hooper, p.62 ... ' in the conception there put forward, and
mathematically worked out, Professor Hill showed that his spherical vortex atom
possessed similar properties and characteristics to the vortex rings of
Kelvin.'' ... that atom would; rotate, be a magnet, possess elasticity,
compressibility, inertia, ... and ... a certain amount of mass.'
The background to these
late 19th century theories, however, fell apart without the tools of massive
computations in turbulence and complexity needed to precisely measure the
material and its behaviour.
Newton's 'unifying
theory of gravity' did not hold the unity of the universe together. Hooper
predicts emergence as a counterbalance to gravity, but believes that stars such
as the sun were the source on the basis of the results published by Michelson
and Morley in 1887 CE in Phil. Mag. December 1887.
Hooper on numerous
occasions predicts true, but unfortunately, he went with Lord Kelvin's 'smoke
rings' and 'linkages' instead of Hill's 'sphere'.
Without the insight
of 'compression' from emergence and accountability for particle recombination
and formation, he did fail to produce unity, but, to date, he has been the most
advanced particle physicist that the 20th Century has ever seen.
Hennessey's Harmonic
Continuum Theory of 2004, however, first collated in 1991 takes a different
approach to scaling and internal processes within ether. Hooper places emphasis
on an analogy of a Kelvin vortex ring atom that is surrounded by an elliptical
cloud of ether, as he had allegedly seen Michelson-Morley publish about Earth's
ether envelope in 1887.
His unifying force
that formed the inside of the vortex was Newton's gravity which he called a
centripetal force.
If I were using his
terminology to explain my theory to him, I would have stated the exact opposite
of his findings.
It should have been
the chaos force that caused the particles
His 'centrifugal'
force was the work of chaos on the atom at time 2 that threw energy out into
turbulence.
It is emergence that
drives the atomic compaction that we discern as 'gravity' and that would make
Hooper wrong about the way that he interpreted atomic gravity and also about
the arrangement of his ideas about physical extremes as perceived by Newton.
e.g. spectra.
This pressure
compresses the ether into bigger particles and pockets that resonate their
etheric substrate at time1 with the activity of transverse waves. This causes
electron shells or 'Quantum numbers'. Rather than a fixed number of quantum
shells, however, there are relatively variable empirical results for the
distances between the energy states of these internal waves.
This and other motions
and spins and relative displacements has caused the paradox of non-locality
observed by Heisenberg. [1927]. and
also by recent physicists who, using more precise technology were able to
manufacture, destroy and enable whole series of arbitrary particles in a
'particle zoo'.
These particles e.g.
charm Quarks, Hadrons, Mesons, Gluons etc became every difficult to classify or
utilise.
The chosen
classification system for the smaller scale atomic components was made
counterproductive by the RGB colour scheme which is non-intuitive.
The Red Green Blue or
RGB colour scheme used to classify 'quarks' does not easily and accurately
predict symmetry within complementary colours and was therefore difficult to
analogise with before attempting to interpret the quark results.
The other difficulty
with Quantum Electrodynamics was that it was not possible to contain and
restrict particle sizes within the theory model. The scaling issue would have
required some 'glue' or 'charm' to keep it all stuck together. This has been
practiced in QED and QCD [Quantum Chromodynamics] using the laws of Boolean
Algebra which as you may see from the Mathematical discourse in this work do
not all add up.
The law of adding
things together A and B to get B and A produces a set containing A and B for
the purposes of calling A and B a particle class. i.e. commutation e.g. or
Abelian sets. Non-Abelian grouping in gauge theories will produce no rational
standard of relativity whatsoever unless either; the laws of association or
distribution are applied. No other Boolean Rules provide any rational
alternative. i.e. Sum, Product, Absorption.
Also, although
Planck's Constant is directly related to frequency of emissions and even though
it is also chained to the Einsteinian lightspeed it is insufficient in
accounting for all the basic factors involved in the energy exchange.
'.. unlike the
halfpenny, however, the value of the quantum is not fixed, but is related to
the frequency of radiation which, by its emission or absorption, causes the
change in energy..'
[Brown GI,
'Introduction to Physical Chemistry SI
Edition', pub. Longmans 1975, ISBN
0-582-32121-X, page 105.]
Planck [1900] in not
measuring the rates of emergence of newly introduced created material had
omitted a second construct out of his equation. Hooper of 1903, had, in fact, a
more sophisticated grasp of the problems within physics that were to continue
for the next 100 years.
The relative
turbulences observed within particle interaction e.g. 'Jet particles' '.. a
system of particles produced during particle reactions at high energies. The
jets are interpreted as fragments of elementary objects such as quarks and
gluons.'
Fritzsch H, 'Quarks,
the stuff of matter' pub. Pelican 1982. ISBN 0-14-022470-X.
The various theories
of the weak and strong electromagnetic interactions and their 'invariant
symmetry transformations whose effects vary from point to point in space time'
[Fritzsch, 1982 p.217.] are called Gauge Theories.
The field theory as
it operates and diminishes by power law between quarks has been noted in terms
of degrees of 'asymptotic freedom.'
Hooper in 1903 p.221.
had already noted the value of Kepler's Third law in this respect using a
holistic planetary analogy.
'.. Whewell on this
matter in his Inductive Sciences states that 'Kepler assumed that a certain
force or virtue resided in the sun by which all bodies all bodies within his
influence were carried round him. He illustrated the nature of the force in
various ways, comparing it to light, and to the magnetic power that it
resembles in the circumstances of operating at a distance, and also of
exercising a feebler influence as the distance increases.
Another image to
which he referred suggested a much more conceivable kind of mechanical action
by which the celestial motions might be produced, viz, a current of fluid
matter circulating round the sun, and carrying the planets with it like a boat
in a stream.' Whewell adds: 'A vortex fluid constantly whirling round the sun,
kept in this whirling motion by the sun itself, and carrying the planets round
the sun by its revolution, as a whirlpool carries straws, could be readily
understood, and though it appears to have been held by Kepler that this current
and Vortex were immaterial, he ascribes to it the power of overcoming the inertia
of bodies, and of putting them and keeping them in motion,' [Hooper, 1902,
p.221-222.]
Kepler's Third Law as
stated by Hooper p.37 and 33 'gives the relation between the (orbit, or)
periodic time of a planet and its distance from its star as: the squares of the
periodic times of planets are proportional to the cubes of their mean distance.
i.e. p.38 .. if we have the periodic time (orbit) of any two planets, and the
mean distance of either, we can find out the mean distance of the other by
simple proportion.'
In the bubble
chambers of the creative particle physicists, however, the Jet and Charm
particles gradually eroding the tenacity of quantum numbering were producing an
assortment of 'Flavour' particles locked into 'infrared slavery' with no
particular reason to be going or staying. In the absence of the local and
temporal emergence gradient figures for that year as some sort of constant to
put into Planck's equation - an additional burden on the already [a priori] etherically burdened speed of
light that would additionally impact on existing matter - they were going to
need 'Glueballs' [Fritzsch H] and 'Spaceballs' [Brooks M] to keep it hanging
together.
In Cosmology, there
would also be cosmic bleeding to account for where large tracts of our cosmic bubble
would leech through an opaque membrane by osmosis - as opposed to the
singularity of transfer created by a black hole.
Andrew Pickering in
his 'Constructing Quarks - a sociological history of particle physics', pub
1986. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 0-85224-535-1 page 413 refers ..
'Twentieth-century science has a grand and impressive story to tell. Anyone
framing a view of the world has to take account of what it has to say ... it is
a non-trivial fact about the world that we can understand it and that
mathematics provides the perfect language for physical science: that, in a
word, science is possible at all. (Polkinghorne (1983))
Such assertions about
science are commonplace in our culture.
In many circles they
are taken to be incontestable. But the history of HEP (high-energy physics)
suggests that they are mistaken. It is unproblematic
that scientists produce accounts of the world that they find comprehensible:
given their cultural resources, only singular incompetence could have prevented
members of the HEP community producing an understandable version of reality at
any point in their history. And, given their extensive training in
sophisticated mathematical techniques, the preponderance of mathematics in
particle physicists' accounts of reality is no more hard to explain than the
fondness of ethnic groups for their native language.'
This problem also
extends into logic where the brick wall of the arbitrary has held up successful
evolution in computing e.g. Turing's Recursion and Gödel's incompleteness of
logic paradoxes. W.V Quine argues that 'the traditional concept of linguistic
meaning should be rooted out of respectable, scientific thinking and enquiry
..' Theories of meaning: after the use theory p.50. (Copeland BJ and Stoothoff
RH - criticising.)
It was easy to see
their point of view in this work.
'Radically
translating' to my own analogy ...
e.g. Mr Quene goes to
Africa deep in the jungle - does something very very bad to the chiefs daughter
- 'gouranga', but Mr Quene asserts that he is always, absolutely going to be
safe and sound every single time he does that on the basis that although he
cannot understand a word they are saying that he cannot interpret their
intentions towards him and their ultimate meaning to his life. i.e. 'these observations
will never narrow down the range of possible translations to just one.'
[Copeland and Stoothoff]
Beyond a doubt then,
unless Mr Quene is tooled up with superior firepower in the American Traditions
of Charlton Weston - AND he can get to the 'Forbidden Zone' in time in
possession of a mean looking monkey suit he isn't going to leave that village
alive - even if the natives cannot agree what the order of precedence should be
for the expiation of their ritual methods of slow execution.
W V Quine, however,
in his book 'The Philosophy of Logic edn.2 pub. 1970, Harvard University Press,
ISBN 0-674-66563-5 on page 69, also displays a rather worrying occupation with
the magical properties of 'new maths' - namely 'Boolean Algebra' though he
doesn't name the rules of; sum, product, absorption as useless or the rules of;
commutation, association and distribution as useful.
With the rules of
semantics broken by the useless Boolean rules and also endorsed by Logicians it
would become difficult to imagine how anybody could make any sense of their
particle physics results whatsoever.
Instead of
Rutherford, Soddy and Planck c.1900 - 1903 with billiard balls held together by
c.1980's 'gluons' whilst radiating quantum shells - there is instead a deluge
of energy compressing into various packets of various sizes between which and
within which are gradients of varying velocities and impedances.
The frequency of
transaction across the density and resistance within each packet is relatively
driven in time with emergence and its field strength in any temporal locality.
At high frequency and
low resistance gradients there are many atomic shells.
The Structural and
scalar persistence and ongoing integrity of atomic localities are due to
resonances between; emergence and frequency driven, pattern-based structural
interdependencies. These aggregates of simples and complexes are continually
fed by the compaction energies of emergence.
Highly facilitative,
rigorous and highly structural postponements amongst driven interstitial elements
e.g. in diminishing order of scale; neutrons, protons and electrons,
incorporate self-sufficiency and relative immunity to emergent driving. At
which point they begin to mirror and more accurately reflect the gradient
products and bi-products that they have been initially attracting by difference
in energy potential. [i.e. from High to Low energy in this particular packet of
ether in which atoms are in growth].
This would eventually
develop into a 'dance of symmetry' which would then attract a greater scale of
focus of these initial components, down an increasingly steeper gradient at
time1.
If the flow continues
to keep the ether pockets supplied in excess, therefore, it will be possible
for inanimate matter to grow.
At this scale of
atomic complexity, two symmetrically entwined systems that are; compacted, fed
by steady and dependable gradient, that are interacting and mutually
interfering with their integrities - may in this turbulence, be able to impart
a notion of scale and symmetry to a third amount of supplied material thus
creating a new and similarly-scaled particle performing to local ratios of
transference.
The energies of
matter interact through the physical transactions of constructive and
destructive interference. The propagation of the transverse waves in variably
dense and turbulent media by harmonic and vibratory motion is driven by
emergence and dissipated by entropy.
The rules of Quantum
Physics [QED] do not regulate particle sizes in Quantum Shells [Peat DH] so
this does entail that it is the transaction that the particle facilitates at
time1, rather than its scale that would classify it in a periodic table.
'In Newland's Law of
Octaves in 1864, he arranged all the elements he knew in ascending order of
relative atomic mass and assigned to the elements a series of ordinal numbers
which he called atomic numbers. He then noticed that elements with similar
chemical properties had atomic numbers that differed by seven or some multiple
of seven.
In other words,
Newland discovered that the chemical
properties of elements were often to be similar for every eighth or sixteenth
element, like the notes in octaves of music.' [Brown GI, 'Introduction to Physical Chemistry, SI
Edition pub. 1972, ISBN 0-582-32131- X]
The process of
emergence, drives the facilitative structure of particles by compressing and
feeding the shells across and through variously dense but persistent, pockets
of ether across an inconsistent but relative transaction gradient.
This will drive the
formation and concretion and cohesion of the particles whilst their elasticity
is being continually challenged by constant change. [Hennessey's Rules, 2004]
In these
circumstances, particle opportunities are; persistent, temporary and generic
and non-generic.
Resonance Hybrids of
these generically similar atomic states interact 'electronically' in variously
indescribable ways. e.g.1
'No single structural
formula which can be written for benzene, for example, accounts for all the
known properties of benzene, and this is so for many other compounds.' [Brown,
p.185], and,
'Ingold introduced
the description of these chaotic interactions as mesomeric states or mesomerism
i.e. 'between the parts'.
In this chaos, atomic
structure itself will shift about and elastically self-regulate, creating
different atomic structures e.g. tautomerism in classical chemistry, or, also
driven to mutate, grow or decay into some other element by emergence, density
and turbulence gradients within the ether.
According to Böhr
[1904], Rutherford's spinning electrons didn't fly away expelled by centrifugal
activity - they couldn't escape because they were locked into stationary
stasis.
Plichta P, pub.
Element 1997 'God's Secret Formula - Deciphering the riddle of the universe and
the prime number code' ISBN 1-86204-014-1,
attempts to account for such dis-integrity in gauge field spaces with a system
of mathematical prime numbers.
He also produces from
this an inference that good things come in threes e.g. egg, larvae, insect, or
base, sugar, phosphate, but his tripartite theory incorporates the 'a priori'
assumption of Planck and Einstein, of fixed; neutrons, protons and electrons,
and that the relationships between these are governed, and regulated by
concepts within definite mathematical space of a relatively planar Sierpinski
Triangle. [a fractal device]
[Another equivalent
of Schiffler's Horns in Superstrings theory or indeed the Koch Curve.]
To quote Plichta,
1997, page 194, '.. in reality, so many atoms collide with each other
simultaneously in a gas-filled space that nobody would ever get the idea that
the kinetics of colliding gas atoms in principle only involve dual collisions
and thus yes-no decisions. The space they occupy thus behaves mathematically
like the grid space that can be described by Pascal's Triangle.'
With interstitial
elements recombining and slewing off e.g. Jet and Charm particles and other
numerous massive unorthodox particles at any and every scale, the best natural
model for scalar complexity, its most simple of models is not in fact the binary
inference of the language [T] as Plichta here infers. By declaring a naive
dualism in Fajan's Rules as a natural law, Plichta has locked particle activity
into a 'monotonic' model that cannot account for the massive activities of
turbulence within the temporally changing and emerging ether. These activities
include factors such as; differences of scale, transfer gradients and
velocities and also the new constant H - the rate of emergence.
Although appealing to
a chaos ontology and being a mathematical approach to locating Heisenberg's
un-locatable particle [1927], Plichta's [1997] strategy, unfortunately, like
any produced in Europe in [1907], still bears the burdens of linearity. It depicts a way with which to evaluate the
effects of particle chaos rather than a methodological description of the
process produced by Hennessey [1997], 'Tripartite Essentialism', page.83,
pub.1997, Outshore Multimedia ISBN 0-9532034-0-9.
The modal Logic of
the Language [A], however, allows for temporal undecidability, and set theory
such as; commutation, association and distribution, such that interacting
scales of creative and destructive recombinants driven and compacted by
emergence can be modeled. With emergence driving an equilibrium there is always
going to be some part of the process at some time1 where it cannot be told what
the process was going to emerge into.
Although the language
[A] allows for this in its most minimal partite logic, it describes the
complete range of these transactions in a closed, finite and absolutely limited
set of essential numbers [A] from [a1, a2 ..a729].
In using Yes, No and
Don't Know, the don't know part allows for Chaos, whilst Plichta's Theory with
essential numbers [T] from [t1, t2 ..t64] does not as every transaction in
Plichta's model is always absolutely certain and always absolutely known.
Energy is being
continually forced into atomic structures, although continually mutating in a
relative harmonic field by degrees of;
folding, gradient and compaction into any recipient etheric pocket. The atomic
field at time1 in this packet of atoms is regulated by ether density, and the
transaction gradient at time1 is driven by harmonic vibration which, depending
on the frequency and the substrate will have several harmonic shells.
The forces of
'gravitational' compaction at the heart of the particle may vary, but they will
contribute to the degree of expulsion that gives shape to the atomic structure
at time2.
The forces of
attraction called gravity - a passive idea, therefore, are in truth, the forces
of compaction - an active concept. Isaac Newton's apple was in fact pushed down
from the sky by a process interruption in the massive scales of carbon within
the tree, where the massive abnormal scaling differences between the branch and
the ground enabled a massive high velocity transfer with very little impedance
to convey it to the ground.
The ethnocentric
vision of good things falling into our laps to uphold our lifestyle without
taking care of our orchards and what shoots they may push up next year has
haunted us for millennia.
Hooper's analogies
and rustic charm of the straws and the whirlpools were more grounded in reality
than one hundred years of pointless hitek cider.
Work done is done by
entropy against new emergence at time2 and self-regulating cohesion and its
innate distribution. This turbulence at time1 by entropy supplies adjacent
particle systems.
This supply, however,
cannot be explained by the models of the last 100 years. e.g. Planck's 'shells'
are 'visualised' [Brown, p.108].
At time1, interplay
between molecules is driven by an emergence gradient of created and recreated
energy and matter via - a mediated transaction of higher to lower, e.g.
osmosis, Fajan, Ohm.
Compaction and
slewing off of particles from atoms by turbulence is a self-regulating
equilibrium. When and if the velocity of the emergent energies of compaction
slows, the bigger particles will donate energy [Fajan, 1924]. This donation
will be mediated and impeded by particle size and number of shells and other gradients
and demands within the adjacent etheric turbulence.
The normalizing
factor on scale and density of atomic structure is the relative density and
consistency of the local ether.
The fundamental
attributes of atomic structure will remain the same in etheric context at any
scale of local etheric context.
e.g. in a state of
unity of cosmological chaos, ether may be so relatively ('impossibly') and
('incredibly') distorted as to produce a carbon atom the size of a football
within a restricted set of circumstances that have penetrated from some lateral
plane of scale. In terms of the current Quantum Theory [QED] one could get some
very large particles in the wrong place.
Stark and Zeeman
noticed that energy levels, and magnitude of 'electricity' in these shells
altered and varied according to the lines of force in a field. This force
depended on the velocity of interaction within and between the atomic
composites and aggregates. The subsequent augmentation or detraction called
'quantum yield' however, will not be universally quantifiable as a law at any
given time, or all of time.
Continual turbulence
will slew away excess energy and ether that the atoms or its crystalline or
state structures cannot hold on to at any given time.
Under the normative
forces of emergence, however, where compaction is very consistent over time,
inanimate matter may through over supply of similarities of the same ratios,
replicate itself.
The equilibrium and
bias caused by the velocity of the emergence gradient and driven across some
value of normative ether, causes harmonic intervals 'atomic shells'.
These are continually
supplied by emergence to retain the elasticity and persistence within Simple
Harmonic Motion [SHM].
Peter Plichta, the
industrial chemist noted in 1997, in 'God's Secret Formula' that sophisticated
carbon-based molecules (e.g. hexagonal ring structures, pentagonal ring
structures etc) seemed a natural priority, but spoke in terms of the 'strict
divisions' p39, and absolutes, p.32. as his model would dictate.
His brilliant
exposition of the chemical morphology of life, however on page 200 and 201 of
his book illustrates his true genius in Chemistry.
Plichta discovers
that the arithmetic of atomic harmony has a direct and formative influence on
the nature and structure of matter and material evolution.
This relates the
threeness in the chemistry of life between the two main classes of lifeform on
this planet: the vertebrates and the invertebrates.
e.g. the insect
evolved in three geological ages: the Carboniferous, the Permian and the Upper
Cretaceous. Its life cycle, finalised 65 million years ago, takes the form of;
egg, larvae, insect - in the morphology of: head, thorax and abdomen.
This insect life upon
whose activities at the bottom of the food chain, the trophic pyramids of
carnivorous and omnivorous vertebrates are based - is comprised and founded on
mainly of hexagonal carbon ring structures.
The vertebrates with:
head, torso and the extremities, also have tripartite reproductive nesting in
their life cycle. e.g. egg, sac, womb.
Plichta noted p.201
'.. I suspected that life on this planet could be mathematically subject to the
conditions of two forms of space. If a flying insect is compared with a flying
animal .. e.g. a swallow - it can be shown that both are built to suit the
space in which they happen to live.
The structure and the
function of the insect incorporates three-dimensional gas-filled space..'
I would disagree with
that, as the swarm model by Langton at
Santa Fe simplifies
this behaviour to a 2-dimensional algorithm.
It does suggest, to
the contrary, that insects are incorporated within 2-dimensional space
operating in relation to stimulii within 3 dimensions as indeed is the swallow
in his example.
Plichta continues, 'A
swallow is constructed entirely differently. It has no armour of hexagonal
sugar - instead it has a skeleton made of inorganic carbon salts.'
The common
architecture of 'swarm' refers to a large number of simple agents interacting,
whether they are a swarm of bees, an ant colony, a flock of birds, or cars in
city traffic. Agents - with their own
internal data and rules - act by passing messages back and forth to each other.
The system also provides a field object to associate the agents with
co-ordinates in space. The agents can modify the environment and in turn their
behaviour is dictated by the state of the environment, providing a feedback
loop. 'We are attempting to capture the architecture in a general-purpose way,'
says Langton. 'Then people modeling insect behaviour, the economy, the
behaviour of molecules getting caught up in complex dynamics, or the evolution
of populations can go to the same simulator and not worry about a lot of very
subtle computer science and engineering issues.'
Langton in [Santa Fe
Institute Bulletin, Fall, 1993, vol8, no.2 page 13-14.]
The end-based telic
principle of the incremental complexity and diversity of life and the predation
and grazing between scales of sophistication - his 'zoological perspective'
does ring true though.
Rupert Sheldrake in
his 'a new science of life - the hypothesis of formative causation' pub.1985,
Paladin, ISBN 0-586-08583-1 page.95 ..' Time after time when atoms come into
existence electrons fill the same orbitals around the nuclei; atoms repeatedly
combine to give the same molecular forms; again and again molecules crystallize
into the same spatial patterns; seeds of a given species give rise year after
year to plants of the same appearance; generation after generation, spiders
spin the same types of web. Forms come into being repeatedly, and each time
each form is more or less the same. On this fact depends our ability to
recognize, identify and name things.
This constancy and
repetition would present no problem if all forms were uniquely determined by
changeless physical laws or principles.' [Sheldrake, p.95]
Sheldrake does not
believe, however, that these laws are testable - as they would have to account
for the prior and automatic evolution of DNA - hence his morphogenetic field
hypothesis of formative causation.
[T] relativity
explains the changeless laws of transaction such that DNA automatically emerges
at the end of a telic emergence chain that compresses the ether into atoms,
that then drives them into complex self-regulating arrangements of transitional
polymers, then further compresses them, if time will allow, into self
replicating autonomous processes that are capable of crossing the energy
barriers presented by scale to emerge into and exploit new material
circumstances.
Kauffman S in Levy S
'Artificial Life', pub. Penguin 1992, ISBN 0-14-023105-6, P.136 demonstrates the emergence of
self-regulating long chain polymers from such a primordial soup.
Kauffman S, 'Origins
of order: self-organization and selection in evolution.', Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1992) or adapted in 'Antichaos and adaptation', Scientific
American, August 1991, pp. 78-85. are other presentations of Kauffman's
discoveries.
In [T] relativity,
the attributes of scaling presented by physical chemistry would present a
created sea of emergent atoms [macro], being driven and compacted into more
complex molecular activity around the transitional, hybrid and interstitial
values within the periodic table of chemistry.
The diversity of the
carbon ring structures e.g. Benzene as previously stated in [Brown GI, 1972]
are not yet fully enumerated.
By analogy with
biological feeding.
Two systems being
over-fed and over-substantiated at time1 interacting and exchanging mutual
interference, introduced to a new amount of symmetrical aggregate at time2 will
be able to influence and drive the symmetrical construction of a substantial
third copy at time3 by sympathetic resonance if conditions amongst the atomic
persist.
Upscaling to
carbon-based life forms of massively complex aggregates and massively complex
postponements of discharge, because of massively complex chemical topographies
- there would be sufficient postponement of entropy for a more perfect
reproductive symmetry to develop [e.g. chaos driven foetus] in this model.
Information Exchange
is analagous to energy exchange in atoms.
It may be said that
in the interests of efficiency that intelligence appears to have a high opinion
of itself - as Langton's Swarm Model at Santa Fe and the many other simulations
within Complexity Studies would suggest.
Within behaviourism,
for example, the physical data that upholds the perceptions of; arts,
philosophy and society can be attributed to the dichotomies presented within
territorial and breeding displays between and within species.
It is not to be said,
however, that I am immediately looking for a pile of bananas or running away
from high voltages.
It has to be
suggested therefore that within my macroscale etheric packets emerging from
myself are evolutionary spaces devoid of alcohol or other biological placebo in
which other priorities emerge that do not distort and break up social
complexity.
I consider myself to
have a soul with a 'fictional finalism' [Adler A] of a unified society.
JUPITER
OUR BINARY STAR - A PREDICTIVE MODEL
Using the Tesla theory of grand unity called the
theory of environmental energy, I will outline the mechanism by which Jupiter
could become a nova.
With our
current understanding of Cosmology and physics, the following theory could be
termed pseudo science. However in a world where scientists like Hawking and
Dawkins regularly meet to discuss the impending defeat of the paradigm my
theory performs what science methodologist and philosopher of science Karl
Popper calls in his 1962 publication ‘Conjectures and Refutations’ – a bold
conjectural leap.
All that
is needed for it to suffice as a scientific model is for it to predict and if
necessary be falsified and discarded if it fails to meet its own criteria for a
theory.
Such
diligence could never have been applied to the Big Bang theory – a dinosaur
well past its sellby date patently ignoring its own refutations for decades.
e.g. the Great Wall a strip of galaxies in the supercluster contain matter far
older than the date of the origins of the universe calculated by the Big Bang.
[Lerner, 1992]
My
prediction makes several assumptions already made and practised by Tesla in his
Theory of Environmental Energy 1910 in that energy pours into the cosmos from
the ether, supplying new particles and mutating others into newer and bigger atoms
and particles. Whilst its known and approved opposite force entropy
degrades and creates newer and smaller
atoms and particles.
The supply
of new energy into the universe from the chaos of the subatomic ether is called
the law of emergence. This law has been much studied and modelled at the Santa
Fe Institute by Kauffman, Langton, and at the Neurosciences Institute by
Edelmann and at Cambridge, England by Goodwin.
All of
these scientists can model the fact that order emerges from chaos and in fact
recombines and degrades and then rebuilds itself into some complex and
structured equilibrium. This can illustrate that the universe grows and
regulates complex matter. E.g. Kauffman’s ‘Self-regulating autocatalytic
polymers’ model.
Emergence
and entropy act synergistically to create and recreate new end based systems.
Contrary
to the second law of thermodynamics which predicts that matter continually and
forever breaks down into minute and homogenous pieces, emergence is the other
side of the coin – it drives structural re-assembly.
The
recombinative power of emergence has been demonstrated by Kauffman in his ‘self
regulating autocatalytic polymer model’ at the santa fe institute.
[www.santafe.edu]
New
energies have been noted in the form of dark matter – pouring into this cosmos
creating surplus, [New Scientist], whilst as far back as 1920, Olbers noted
that if there was no ether the night sky would be white because all of the
photons in the cosmos should be here by now.
It can
only be ether that keeps our night sky dark by acting as an impedance to the
passage of photons.
Ether,
Emergence and Wave theory, in the context of fluid dynamics were explored as
early as 1901 by Lord Kelvin with his vortex theory of ether – but it was the
assumption of Einstein to the impoverished throne of disunity in the early 20th
Century that took mankind away from the fluid dynamics model of energy.
Recent
cosmologists and high energy physicists have created ‘sub atomic ether/plasma’
by boiling up particles into a fission driven gluon soup – but the reality of
natural fusion is largely ignored in a
world view dominated by disintegration, fission and entropy.
Against
the backdrop of emergence which is a largely ignored and unexplored law of
chaos science – new kinds of physical theories of the cosmos can come into
being. When combined with fluid dynamics and turbulence studies they provide
the essence of a wave based physical theory of the cosmos.
The
following conjecture about the possibility of fusion within Jupiter assumes that matter is being
continually created and uses Tesla’s 1910 Theory of Environmental Energy with
which to predict, borrowing no paradoxes from 20th century physics.
Recent
astronomy has provided evidence of distant solar systems containing hot, gas
giant planets akin to Jupiter in Earth’s solar system.
I intend
to speculate that by the laws of symmetry and self-assembly within the duality
of matter and energy that all physical systems tend to reproduce and grow. From
this reasoning I speculate [yahoo groups grandunity3000, files section, numbers
and agreements, chapter 3] that all solar systems with gas giants tend to
become binary star systems.
How though
could Jupiter ever become a binary star for our Sun given its presumed state of
low energy as calculated by our current and prevalent physics.
I will
present a trigger mechanism for Jupiter based on Tesla’s Physics.
Jupiter
has a centre of gravity, most probably a seed rock around which the gasses and
liquids have then gathered. Jupiter is comprised of predominately non-metallic
elements many of which could be compressed by gravity into superconductors
around the core.
Into this
planetary atomic environment comes the energy of the subatomic ether channelled
through the centre of gravity at the planets core.
Earth’s
centre of gravity has been reported to be an electrostatic environment.
It has
been reported by mythology that there is a crackling, smoking electrical sun at
the heart of the Earth [‘The Smokey God’].
The ether
is in and around all atoms and all particles as the ether directly drives their
very existence as standing waves in etheric turbulence. Much like the red spot
in the eye of Jupiter – particles are harmonic storm systems directly linked to
the medium from which they emerge. Harmonic attributes and arithmetic are
constantly to be found even amongst cover-ups like quantum theory and
superstrings.
Most of
the emergent force however would be focussed at the planetary centre of
gravity, more so than at the periphery of the mass of the planet.
Through
the core of Jupiter comes the force and energy that drives the creation of new
particles and atoms and this force will seek to radiate out beyond the planets
surface, dissipating as a creative force as it gets beyond the planetary mass
and atomic and particulate ingredients.
The force
of emergence, brings new energies and subatomic particles into Jupiter through
its core and will alter, mutate and grow the atoms at the planets core.
This will
have created over vast time, semi-metallic transitional elements around the
seed rock of Jupiter, like a very porous skin comprised of several kilometres
of inconsistent semi-metallic atomic aggregates.
These
semi-metallic elements will act like a capacitor, holding the suns
electrostatic charge and creating a huge potential difference or voltage
between the core and the semi-metallic skin.
What would
usually happen because of the electro-porous nature of the skin, is that the
variation in the force of emergence and the variation in the Sun’s
electromagnetic output that the amount of charge held by the leaking
semi-conductor would tend to dissipate.
When,
however, the electromagnetic output of the sun is unusually high e.g. now ..
where most of the planets in the solar system are currently warming up, less of
the electrostatic charge around Jupiter’s core will leak away and will build up
a massive potential difference between the skin and the core.
When the
charge in the semi-metallic skin reaches a critical threshold under these new
solar conditions it will or could cause a change of state in its constituents
overcoming the physical and atomic constraints to its discharge and will
forcibly discharge its massive voltage triggering a cold fusion reaction in
Jupiter’s core.
Jupiter
will then, I predict, follow in the footsteps of other binary star solar
systems by self-assembling itself into a fusion driven binary star.
Another
twist to this tale and all the what if’s is that IF this theory predicts
correctly then there is another problem with Jupiter that needs urgent seeing
to.
As an
entity involved in fusion Jupiter tends to the light metallic end of the
spectrum but in the year 2001 it was hit by a comet comprised wholly of
Plutonium – a very heavy metal.
This comet
was not Shoemaker-Levy number 9 in 1999 but in the order of Shoemaker-Levy
12-14. The hit of the plutonium asteroid was in 2001 and was announced by Peter
Sissons on BBC UK Evening News as an ‘and finally’ item towards the end of the
programme.
With a
large amount of heavy metal plutonium in the fusion mixture – Jupiter could
easily get indigestion, creating not only fusion but fission reactions driven
by the extreme weight of the Plutonium. Jupiter might not only be a nova – but
potentially could also explode and eject matter into the solar system creating
havoc amongst the planets.
The
presence of a large amount of heavy metal salts could potentially be disruptive
and antagonistic as the elements engaged in fusion would have been primarily
lighter.
Some may
say that maybe hostile aliens more than aware of the physics of Tesla attempted
to destroy the solar system by asteroid attack.
The
solution though is relatively simple too – a massive injection of transitional
elements such as carbon and iron into the fusion mixture – before it fires
itself into life.
This maybe
gives us 10 years to fix the problem before the solar activity predicted by the
Mayans creates the possibility of fusion in Jupiter.
We can
treat the planets explosive indigestion with a dose of carbon – probably with
about 100 – 1000 times the mass of Plutonium that went into Jupiter.
I’m sure
there’s plenty pure transitional elements floating about nearby in the asteroid
belt.
To
conclude then, by our current world view of physics, none of the above is
possible, but then there is no theory in today’s physics apart from Tesla’s
that could explain the interstellar craft that currently flood into our
camcorders.
Thus far I
have been totally unsuccessful finding confirmation of that Showmaker Levy
12-14 plutonium comet in 2001 – and I’ve been looking and asking the usual
suspects.
Another
ironic note is that the comet hit in 2001 – very Arthur C Clarkesque … but in
Clarke’s sequel 2012 also a film, Jupiter becomes a binary star. It doesn’t go
supernovae in the film though – that one has a happy ending.
I think,
personally, that someone is trying to tell us something ….
Andrew
Hennessey
Grandunity3000
yahoo group