CHAPTER 02. TRIPARTITE  RELATIVITY [T] 

 

A UNIFYING  'META' PHYSICS OF  REALITY. 

 

INTRODUCTION .

 

'There is no formula that can deliver all truth,  all  harmony, all simplicity. No Theory of Everything can ever provide  total insight. For, to see through everything, would leave us  seeing  nothing at all.'  JOHN D. BARROW prof. of Astronomy. SUSSEX

 

Barrow was totally wrong.

The above is the concluding paragraph of a book written in 1991  which seems to hide the light of 'absolute truth' under the  bushel of arbitrary and  infinite form.

 

There is a formula that can deliver all the truth. It is a recipe comprised of several factors operating synergistically togther.

 

·        Order emerges out of chaos.  [fusion]

·        Chaos emerges out of order.   [entropy and fission]

·        The universe is in a state of absolute chaos in both the macrocosm and the microcosm.

·        Energy and matter and component particles can be described by wave theory, turbulence and the standing waves or particles take on harmonic and octal attributes.

·        There are no fixed universal constants in the macrocosm.

·        All energy and matter is in a state of transference from high energy to low energy across a common medium i.e. A to B  through C with the minimal intercession of some D.

·        This transference can be universally modelled by an inverse square power law.

·        Every material and ergonomic system and event is unique but  can be  classified according to similar properties.

·        General Systems Theory called Trinology models every transference event outwith considerations of scale.

·        Trinology labels every system in the Universe with 3 attributes:  1. Ingredients [macro]

2. internal mechanics [meso]

3. qualitative   [micro]

 

 

·        Every physical system has three components and each of the three components has 2 attributes.

      1. Endogenous                            

      2. Exogenous – and this 

      produces a total of six power laws [6 fulcra] with which to model 

      every  event in the material Universe.

·        Relativism and the power of analogy can strip away arbitrary labels and expose and model the exchanges that characterise every system at every scale.

 

 

In January of 1993, however, my Theory of Relativity  -  the  'Unifying  Theory' of Everything, [T], was launched on the Internet.

Supporting research on Chaos and Wave Theory verifies many assertions and discoveries  in the  thesis as empirical certainty.

e.g. the law of emergence.  [Kauffman, S and Langton, C]

The Santa Fe Institute and also the many  researchers in Physics  such as; Tomes, Plichta, Langton, etc. published in the early and mid-nineties ideas that  illuminate the 'eightness' of form.

Such research usually culminates in a hypothesis that the Universe  could be harmonic and Music etc

I should claim that since the chaos neologia of Santa Fe are   essentially biological, my own terminology has a more 'universal' scope  about it e.g. instead of 'morphogenetic attractor' which is biological, substitute 'evolutionary  vacancy', which could also be applied to activities and opportunities at the level of scale of the Molecular and the transferance behaviour of ‘Fajan’s Rules’. Moreover other emergence activities and infilling of vacuums  in domains and scales other than the Biological can be described by  the same physical rules and terminology.

 

The idea that nature abhors a vacuum, is the simple reality behind   the morphogenetic attractor, where an opportunity for evolution occurs to fill  a gap left by the chaotic processes of expansion and contraction in the  life history of biologically and physically chaos-driven systems. Consequently, a new system emerges  to fill in the evolutionary opportunity. This opportunity was formed and dictated by the imposed contextual parameters  and challenges to tolerances within the original system. Such changes in interaction between the original system and its environment create a pocket of opportunity into which may flow local precursors that would form a new self-regulating environment and a newly evolved niche.

[T] research, however,  does not limit this phenomenon of pocket formation to biology, and names this kind of vacuum an 'Evolutionary Vacancy' .

The chase for solar system access and new mineral and farming opportunities offered by an elusive Grand Unified Theory  is  now mathematical rhetoric and mindgames,  incorporating the latest unwieldy research into twenty six  dimensional Superstrings and non-dimensional particles.

A flurry of fruitless academic activity out-paces Newton and  Einstein,  and  the  potential  of  all  our  Empirical systems to measure.  With the coming of Edge of Chaos Theory, however, it has been demonstrated that  other researchers [Kauffman S and Langton C] using  terms  such as Emergence and Complexity, are now on the road to a full Unifying Theory using a totally different model from the physics of the last 100 years.   

The ability of the [T] semantics and syntax to enable logical analogies between different  systems that have the same basic rule structure has given this  theory a real competitive edge over the many failures in the genre  of General Systems Theory. 

[T] overcomes an infinity of labels and objects by focussing on and labelling the quality of transaction that prevails between them all. Every object in the cosmos in three dimensions of space and in the context of time has a fixed and closed number of transaction models available. Such modelling overcomes the problems presented to scientists by an infinity of arbitrary labels.

The idea that the Set of component parts of this transaction theory is logically  closed and formally complete gives us the broad analogy that every  system in the universe has a limited number of component parts  that produce their characteristics.    

The best known scientific example of this is the Periodic Table of Chemistry.  Where infinite form is based upon a finite set of atoms.   Chemistry, then is a sort of living model of  variety produced from limitations.   In this set of chemical ingredients, the reactants have a tendancy to  mutate   and migrate  towards the electro-chemical equilibrium at the middle of the range    of transition elements :- 

Such  physical behaviour  manifests  at all scales. e.g. In the same way the artificial life colonies of Langton's Santa Fe computers   move towards the semi-structural transition states known as the 'Edge of Chaos'  

The broad analogy here, is that a metaphysical soup with limited ingredients develops an 'interest' in reaching an equilibrium. An interest driven by Fajan’s Rules of Chemistry that energy in atoms and molecules move from a higher state to a lower state across a common medium. 

This was also found by Kauffman's in Levy S, autocatalytic proteins and by Goodwin's in Lewin R, Acetabularia model, which found that local rules for an 'eye' generated an eye as an emergent property of a dynamic chaos system. The organism 'acetabularia' emerged and demerged an eye several times during the modelling process.

This anti-Darwinian fact, if modelled, logical and true, rather flies in the face of other 'laws of physics and science' too. Kauffman, having already found that biological systems sometimes ignore the second law of thermodynamics when they start to re-evolve, emerge and self-regulate.

Cosmically, the Big Thermodynamic  Heat Death theory; where our infinitely expanding and cooling Universe has no brakes, is just as false.  Yet the Hennessey model [1991 CE], from the [T] thesis,  predicts that  this is only half the picture. i.e.  Structure  emerges  from  Chaos  for  nothing.  Emergence and Demergence or entropy are two halves of the same natural order.

Chaos emerges from structure [entropy] – the other half of the equilibrium.

 

Tripartite Relativity can provide an insight into the  workings  of Universal Order - making possible at once;  Particle  Theory  and Artificial Intelligence, Chronology, Social Psychology and a  formal  programmable theory  for  the  Philosophy of Mind.  This Thesis [T] also provides an alternative to the many  dilemmas  of Quantum Theory and postulates a metaphysical framework  that  bipasses Superstrings - called Harmonic Continuum Theory  [HCT]. This particle wave theory is a consistent extension of Tripartite Relativity ontology.

Trinology the one tidy set of mechanics that  ties  all  Human  Knowledge  together, the means to unite the Information of  the  Macrocosm  with that of the Microcosm,  has not been  forthcoming until now.

Academic resistance  is  still proving an impediment to Scientific progress.  Indeed a general systems theory  is still considered by many eminent Scientists and Philosophers  as an outdated fad of the seventies  or at worst - esoteric. E.g.  as postulated by L.W Bertalanffy (General  Systems  Theory ).  Unfortunately Bertalanffy and his  group  had  no  logical  and  ontologically consistent system to present and his work was  dismissed  by  critics from the Logicist and Realist schools of Philosophy.

 

If Tripartite Essentialism was not based upon a Natural Law, it   would have foundered on the same old logicist arguments that buried Bertalanffy.  The logical and mathematical syntax of this system [T] puts it not on  a  basic  inductive, irrational and falsifiable hypothetical footing,  but  in  the  format of deductive logic, tautology and mathematical fact. 

 

For scholars of the classical metaphysics, there are contradictions. E.g.  the  fleeting  chaos  of  Heraclitus, the  total  structure  of  Parmenides,  and lodged  somewhere on the edge of Chaos or indeed the edge of  Structure  is the persistence of the Aristotelian atom.

None of those schools, however, are solely adequate as a conceptual model for [T].

Tripartite Essentialism in this sense has no particular  school  of metaphysic, being also unable to claim any  school of Deductive reason  in Chinese Archaeology.

e.g. the Oracular books of Ta Pau.  [Walters, 1983].

One of the profound consequences of the  Tripartite  theory  is  that the case for the existence of the eight  basic  Tripartite  Archetypes is based in synthetic  a priori  mathematics  and  therefore has ramifications for the Philosophy of Arithmetic  -  for it  dispenses with the traditional Fregean need  to  derive  numerals and 'wholes' from empty sets.  

Our entire mathematical and technological and electronic tradition is based upon the rather unsound notion  that any one number is actually an empty set - which rather makes our culture a bit insubstantial and logically unjustifiable.

In logic, to justify how a TV or VDU works without mentioning the uncertain continuity of deduction caused by the irrational behaviour of photons in a quantum state is impossible. Photon A makes a quantum leap, at time1 but it does not have to be photon A that returns, at time2. it could well be photon B. Since this can't be logically quantified, our entire civilisation is built upon  irrational  uncertainty and therefore our VDU becomes a 'black box' in more ways than one.  

This Thesis will change all that for good.  Further, the ontological authenticity of  the  fundamentals  of  this theory ensures that any arguments for 'relativity' are not  without  consistent   foundation.   Indeed  Logical Completeness   and  Compactness results for the logical syntax and  semantics  have  been established.  This means, basically. that the  set  of  64  has  been  turned  inside out, diluted and compacted and  is  still  ontologically  valid and completely related as any tautological and continuous relationship between two points would be. [Boolos and Jeffrey].

The  archaeological appearance  or  connotations  of  this  symbolism is unimportant and arbitrary as 1's and 0's are wholly sufficient for computational purposes in Boolean mathematics.

No reference to the classically irrational and well known I Ching  is intended or desired. Historically the I Ching was originally only one of several works  that formed the Ta Pu, the  Grand  Oracle.  It  has  long  been  thought that the I Ching's companions had been  destroyed,  but  through the efforts of Walters [1983], the  T'ai  Hsuang  Ching  (THC) has been restored.  From the  diagrams  of  THC,  (hereafter  referred  to  as  the  language [H])  it is evident that it too  looks  as  if  it  is  capable of modelling all modal states  from  total  non-structure  to  total structure.

 

According to Walters [1983], there seems  to  have  been  other  line and number combinations, however,  the  symbolism  of  the  known Ta Pu,  both  individually  and  collectively  are  known to be related to Chinese culture and social history.

[T] uses the symolism rationally to denote state  descriptions of a system at some stage of  transformation  from  one state into another. (A form of Modal Logic.)  

The idea being that Tripartite or three-part relativity can be expanded  to take in the idea that for any given event, we may not know what is happening because we are uncertain what kind of state description to give to the three reacting components.  

The Logic of uncertainty is called Modal Logic and it has previously been considered to be a set of irrational constructs that add-in recursion that then creates the Turing recursion problem with infinite possibilities to a dilemma.

If the number of modalities can be restricted and closed, however, as in the language [A], then important steps in the dynamic modelling of natural systems can be made as these tend to cycle and recycle many intermediate parts and components.

The once vaunted 19th century physics of Newton, for instance, is proving to be at heart under a greater computational microscope the mathematics of a more general, metatheoretical law.

Sophisticated  20th century computer studies in Paris [c.1992 CE] of the planets and heavenly bodies indicate that  the complex gravitational anomalies that are occuring in the solar system are very much based on the mathematics of Chaos Theory.  

 

The tools of measurement themselves have been fraught   with philosophical compromise in the name of the current scientific paradigm.  These; measurers, rulers, or mechanisms, unfortunately, are evolving into Black Boxes  of  the input-output type, because of the irrational inconsistencies within modelling. These theories cause observable discrepancies in scientific information.

This means  that  no-one  really  knows  what the internal mechanics look like as it would apply to any other domain or idiom.

Theoretical compensations such as Instrumentalism [Dulhem], 'if it ain't broke don't fix it.' or Falsification [Popper], 'run that one by me again' attempt to deal with our inadequate scientific understanding of the physical performance of a unified reality that never showed its best side to Albert Einstein.

Instrumentalism  Dulhem  [1952]  will  tell us that if this Black Box  is  a  rational  mechanism, it isn't required of us to make the mechanics  copy reality,  only  that its results are shown to reflect reality.  e.g. a hot air balloon flies, a bi-plane flies and is great who needs a spacecraft when you cannot really live in space ?

You know a balloon flies, a biplane flies - what's with this 'Translation StarDrive' thingy.

 

Popper's  [1963] scientific methodology from 'Conjectures and  Refutations' , and  Dulhem's Instrumentalism [1952], seem to anchor themselves in a  bygone  era of line-drawing between  Corpuscular  atoms,  and  in  fact  ought to but cannot account for; Plasma  physics,  Chaos  theory  and  the  context-orientated Tripartite  Relativity  proposed  in this  thesis. The fact that it cannot is due to the bad practise of the scientific method during the technological and economic revolution of the late 20th century.

The pollution of scientific information and opinion as evidenced in the misrepresentation of currently available information is on a parity with the outpourings of the Lancashire Cotton Mills and Yorkshire Mines of the 19th century Industrial Revolution into  the pool of human possibilities.

Outfall from 20th Century data mining has created a synthesis of 'magical realism' and neologia that cannot withstand critical analysis. It is the slag from the smelters of an economic synthesis that has driven the incorporation of globalism beyond nation states

and local vested interests.

Although one could 'not make an omlette without breaking a few eggs' one does have to ultimately clean up the mess in the academic and regulatory kitchen too.

We seem unable to come to terms with the mechanics  and  mathematics of  'nebulousity' which awaits at the forefront  of  today's  scientific achievement and measuring instruments. 

The old reliable and fashionable Rutherford atom gives  way  to  the bottomless chaos of a Koch Curve,  Strange  Attractors, basins of attraction, periodicity, emergence and entropy  and other  anonymous  context related events. 

Indeed stripping away the context from material events produces paradoxes such as the particle wave duality paradox – the solution to which is that a particle is both a particle and wave at the  same time emerging from the chaos of the ether.

John Horgan, science writer for Scientific American, takes a sober

look at modern science and scientists and points out the sparsity of many made up or invented theories, such as 'Inflation theory' (the modern version of the Big Bang).

 

Even  the  Big  Bang  Theory  is  deemed redundant   by   Scientific  measurement from plasma physicists [Lerner [1992]] as they discovered a strip of galaxies called The Great Wall comprised of matter far older than could be possibly calculated using  the Big Bang model.

Yet another ignored refutation flying in the face of good scientific practise. 

 

The entire action of the  Institution  of  Physics  appears  by  these measurements to be undermined,  whilst  the  convolutions  required by  Big  Bang  theorists  to  keep  the  theory  alive  seriously undermine its remaining credibility in  the  eyes  of  Popperian  Methodologists  [and also those who practise common sense] who  would  maintain  that  theories  should not be continually modified to  meet  new  and  emerging  facts or else they are unfalsifiable and hence nonscience.

Hew Price, reader in philosophy at the university of Sydney and

author of Time's arrow and Archimedes' Point shows us that many of the supporting arguments for the big bang do not hold water and goes on to show the inconsistencies in various parts of the current versions of the big bang. In his book the big bang never happened, cosmologist Eric Lerner is puzzled at why so many scientists adhere to the big bang theory in the face of the overwhelming evidence against it and imagines some sort of pseudo religious conspiracy, pointing out the fervour with which scientists and thinkers have grasped on to obviously wrong theories in the past.

[Thanks to Robert Karl Stonjek for research into current   publications in Cosmology.]

Thus  if the Big Bang theory cannot predict the emergence  of  these  new  and  disconcerting facts, it should logically and scientifically be  abandoned  in  favour  of  a  better model. 

At  this  point pseudo-science beckons, for it  becomes all too easy  to   introduce   Descarte's  epistomological scepticism - 'how can we know anything' etc. 

The world of Descarte's mathematics and algebra  and  Cartesian  coordinates in the 19th century demonstrated that  a  rational  topography  of  the  early scientific paradigm could be charted. Beyond the surety  of  this  map  lurked  the  irrational. 

Time   and   distance,  schedules, statistical and  socio-economic  production  charted  the efficiency and rationality of social artefacts whose  solid  nature was held together by the tiniest and yet  the  strongest  and enduring of bricks, Rutherford's atomic model.

All  achievements  could  be  percieved  along a linear and three dimensional schedule of  artefacts  in  relation to the application of time and a rational psychology. 

These points and all communication relating to  them  could  be  represented by Logical Atoms, Wittgenstein [1932] and anything else  was  irrational.  Thus in avoiding anything slightly metaphysical and abstract it  was hoped to remain rational, and by taking Hume's 18th Century  advice in consigning metaphysical rationale to the flames,  the  Scientific establishment of the 20th century aspired to clarity  and precision with measuring implements whose most basic operational secret takes place unobserved and unlocated by 'Heisenberg' [c.1923 CE] within an ‘irrational’ black box.

It is the intention of this thesis to solve  this mystery,  making the solution; clear, logical and empirical.

See the chapter on Harmonic Continuum  Theory [HCT]. A new Particle Physics that has no central Paradox. 

Older scientific ideology such as;  Newton,  and Einstein has taken us in successive  steps  up  the  ladder  of  reality, but the incomplete nature of their explanations, their  lack of Universifiability has in a way a resemblance to  Xeno's  Paradox - in that it doesn't look like the sort of ladder  that  we are ever going to reach the end of.  The answer to this  problem  must  lie  with  some  essentially  consistent system that is universally applicable to  everything  - a theory of everything.

If  it  existed, how would Karl Popper ever have  been  satisfied  with  it, for like astrology, it could never be proved wrong.  Popper would have none of this  abstraction,  yet  the  central  Lemmas of  this  thesis  demonstrate  the  logical  genesis  of  essences from  very basic mathematical tautology and logical chemical truths. 

The interpretation of these concepts, Popper may have  argued  are  metaphysical and not realist  and  therefore  not  relevant  to  Scientific  Method.  Absolute scientific clarity was impossible in Popper’s day. A day that had no knowledge that the chaos law of emergence refutes the basic laws of physics and  thermodynamics.

Any  resultant  scientific theories   and  interpretations about the Universe of the arbitrary and its labels and processes are then fanciful if a topographical approach is taken to observations in an 'intuitive' way. In these circumstances, for Popper, there would always be room for improvement.

The transaction models of [T], however are absolutely true.

 

The [T] particle theory is called Harmonic Continuum Theory -  and  the full implications of chaos processes driving unique events will be explored in Class Atomism.

The new frontiers of empirical measurement lead to a re-interpretation of particle  theory  in the light of  the  very  tentative  and chaotic reality  that  persists  before our eyes. 

Onto the  deductive  nature  of  [T] systems modelling we put a value or social synthesis that  we can relate to.

This synthetic  a priori   theory  confidently predicts the properties of the  Periodic  Table  of  Chemistry - and as an archetypal and universal model   -  can  be  referred to as the Periodic Table of Energies [PTE] because  it  can model the ergonomic relativity of other systems besides merely the chemical.

 

We  left  the 20th Century corpuscularean  paradigm  linked  by  lines  and  infrastructure and held together  by  the  objectivity  of  the logical positivists of the 1930's  Vienna Circle, yet over this landmass of solid  realism,  there  blow the winds of contradiction. 

In chaos theory there  are no definite outcomes but embraced as  a system of Holism can universally account for every scale of physical system.

It is a sunny day today in this part of Britain, but this  does  not entail the belief that there will be sunny days forevermore  - this is because the physical conditions and parameters of the  atmosphere in and around Britain are a  direct  consequence  of  Geothermal conditions in a planetary context.  Thus  high  and  low  pressure,  strange  attractors  in  chaos  turbulence render induction and prophesy impossible.

In an era of precise measurements and refined empirical tools, linear processes are being detected and  measured to be connected to other parallel processes. The era of Linearity and Reductionism is being superceded by Chaos Theory and Complexity.

The cry of  Dulhem's [1952] instrumentalism  requires  of  a  theory  'Be  a  prophet for us !' but all science can do is say that there will  not be sunny days in Britain forevermore, and fail  to  predict  exactly and specifically where and when in time and  space there will be.

It is in  such an idiom as chaos theory that the beauty of Russell and Whiteheads Theory of Classes c.1930’s comes into its own.

It  is the case that a sunny day in Britain is  like  the  nebulous  quantum, we  just  cannot  locate it  with  precision [Heisenberg's non-locality paradox] - this  because it too dances to the tune of chaos.  It is therefore logical and objective to say that  the  precise  position of good and  bad  weather  events  and  days  in  this  climate are logically undecidable, and that their  whereabouts  or  lack of it cannot be completely guaranteed with  precision  and  high  factual  empirical  and  scientific  detail   in   minute  localities.

In this instance  'weather'  is  a  class  of  variable atmospheric events, a realistic variation on the theme and context of, geography.  The result of geographical orientation (or context) is  Climate  which is the umbrella under which the British weather operates. 

The British weather, however is intimately connected to and dependent on weather conditions in other countries around the globe. But all events occur in context - a chemical reaction occurs in  a test tube, the sea fills the oceanic trenches and stays there  with the aid of Newtonian physics, and rhesus macaques  perform  their monkey business in the canopy of the forest having learned potatoe washing behaviour from another isolated community of rhesus macaques one thousand miles away from their island.  This is interconnectivity is called Holism. 

Within these activities we can manufacture and synthesise sets of rules and agreements.

e.g. Scottish weather, Southern English weather, new world rainforest, old world rainforest.

 

It  is true therefore that if sets of complex systems illustrate a Universal principle, that  similarly, classes of particle activity are produced or  evolved  from  the jungle of the sub-atomic context - a sort of Particle Darwinism, and  that  somehow,  these particles are intimately related to their context in ways  we cannot see. If we wish to study a monkey, we take it off  to  a lab and examine it.  In fact we have, as they  say,  taken  it  out of its natural habitat i.e. decontextualised it.  Decontextualisation is the bane  of  science  for  it  subjects  relativitism  to  a  destructive  reductionism  that   tends   to  eliminate the parallell process e.g. the Collapsing Wave Paradox  is a paradox because  there  is  some  factor  operating  which  creates a problem. We are so sure  that  particles  are  little  independent  corpuscles  that  the  very  idea  of  a  parallell  relativity with another process  is  inconceivable  -  that  is  perhaps why for most people  it  will  remain  a  dead  end  in  science, for we cannot seem to touch and  verify  the  type  of  dependent  relation of the ether that exists.  

Olbers noted that if Einstein was right to agree with Michelson Morleys c.1920 experiment that proved that there was no ether, then the sky should be white at night because all the photons in the cosmos have had ample time to be here by now.

The sky is black at night because some scientifically unaccountable factor is giving them resistance and holding  them up – the very proof of ether. This is Olbers ‘paradox’ c.1920.

 

The relativity of  New Particle Physics can be demonstrated by an analogy with a musical instrument the body of which is comprised   of sub-atomic etheric particles from whose Chaos Emerges  a note or Particle.  

Now if this analogy holds, using our five senses, we can see   the subatomic particles in the world of colours and vision and  'musical instruments', but we can only hear the Particle 'note' within   the idiom of sound and because emergence  is not a widely understood   process, the causative link between the idiom of particle production and the  particle itself could not be explained by a reductionist theory which    decontextualised the particle from its reason for being.   Which is why Particle Physics is today in disarray with umpteen paradoxes   and anomalies like 26 mathematical dimensions to explain a superstring etc. 

This  process  of  decontextualisation  effectively  removes  a  dimension  or  tier  of  relationships  from  rational  thought  because a monkey can  be  touched and  verified  and  not  the  irrational metaphysical relationship between the monkey and the  tree. Without Holism the study of the monkeys and particles  is  undecidable,  for all the monkeys in the lab  are  lab  monkeys,  not  forest  monkeys in much the same way that  all  the  particles  in  the  particle zoo are lab particles out  of  the  context  of  their  natural habitat - natural relativity. What then is this  canopy  under which the particle zoo of bizarre hybrid particles flourish e.g. The basic  laws  of  fluid dynamics can model energy as a fluid. It  gets  turbulent,  the  turbulence has peaks and troughs of intensity, areas of violent  flux, and within this non homogenous mix,  areas  of  calm  and  structure, the Strange Attractors that have  become the temporary hybrid particles  currently  observed.

Much like the Gas Giant planet Jupiter has  the  characteristic  Red Spot, the persistent eye of a fluid storm,  the  Basic  and  unique particles themselves exist by virtue  of the storm  of  sub-atomic  energies in the Cosmos, the flux of  the  Essences,  and amidst the calm islands which are the structural fruits  of  flux. 

An old theological question was how many angels could dance  on  the head of a pin.  Koch curves, Cantors Dust, Mandelbrot Sets all the size of  any  strange attractor augur infinity delineated within the confines  of a pinhead, whilst particles the size of angels  collide and  mutate and avoid time as they dance on a precision-tooled  pin- like Artefact produced by the interaction of the mind with what  is familiar and obvious in the world - the mysterious  quantum- based computer.  The rational mind tries to pin the thread  of  Ariadne  on  its  disappearing protege the quantum particle as it  vanishes  from  view into the Labyrinth of Chaos, Infinity. 

The  two  dimensional  linear   solution   to   the   maze   is  Superstrings, but the real solution is to look at the maze from  on high.  The minotaur of doubt haunts the 20th Century maze of  science, but  actually doesn't exist.  The paradoxical monster, the fruit of decontextualised  systems  is potentially around the corner limits of the next equation.  This Spectre of the maze is known to Maxwell  as  Maxwell's  Demon  Paradox - is actually a two dimensional decontextualisation  of  the processes of the laws of physics - this is made clear later.

The same  spectre  haunted  Hume  with  Hume's  Induction Paradox i.e. 'How can we know that the  sun  will  rise  tomorrow' and another example he gives illustrates this; 'how can  we know that the next loaf of bread that we eat is going to  be  nutritious. ' This presents decontextualisation on a   massive  scale,  where  the  processes  of  plant  sugar  metabolism,   photosynthesis,  genotypic and phenotypic evolution have been assumed to have suddenly and unaccountably disintegrated  because  the Carbon and Phosphate cycles have 'magically' ceased to function. 

In fact, however, whether star or wheat, no such chaotic process is instantaneous but emits physical indicators.

The failed era of scientific reductionism can be superceded by holistic ontologism, relativism and analogy.

 

In biotechnological research in the 20th Century, genetics laboratories failed to come up with safe cloning practises and a line in viable clones.

Encountering scientific discussion on regulated newsgroups on the internet, there was always an obvious line in clinical and logical purity that espoused Eugenics.

The perfect genes for every ocassion.

The paradigm of scientific reductionism let loose on genetic engineering that incessantly produced un-unified physics and collapsing waves was now going to produce un-unified biology and collapsing clones.

The paradox was the same for biology as for physics.

There needed to be an environmental and holistic approach to the genes used in cloning, not a reductionist set of genetic constructs that were based in purist and reductionist assumptions.

The analogy I use is that if industry constructed artificial rice, where the polysaccahrides of rice sugars were manufactured to produce a synthetic rice grain - it would not contain the important nutrition of wholefood organic brown rice, where the husk and the other organic micronutrients from the local environment combine to make the rice far more nutritious and viable.

I argue that eugenic engineering even if using allegedly super-viable genes would actually produce an organically arbitrary phenotype that had no greater chance of success than any other e.g. human gene set.

This because genetic function was intimately linked and internested within the environment and could not be factored out even if scientists wore the laboratory goggles of reductionism.

The 'collapsing clone paradox' that I predicted around 2000 CE started to become a reality.

 

http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au

Faults likely in cloning of humans   07sep01

 

COLLEGE STATION, Texas: scientists at Texas University yesterday unveiled a menagerie of cloned animals that could help answer some of mankind's most puzzling questions.

The university, 130km northwest of Houston, said it was the first to clone three different animal species - cattle, goats and pigs - but was still struggling to produce a cloned dog.

The researchers said they had learned it was far too early for anyone to think about cloning human beings, as some groups have proposed.

Although they had produced multiple animals from the same genes, each clone came out differently and there were a high number of abnormalities.

 

'We still have a lot to learn about the process', said Professor Jorge

Piedrahita. 'We don't know what we're doing to these animals.'

 

From Zwire http://www.zwire.com

Chinese Cloned Goat Gives Birth to Twins

Copyright 2001 XINHUA NEWS AGENCY August 08, 2001

 

XI'AN, Aug 8, 2001 (Xinhua via COMTEX) -- Yangyang, a goat cloned from an adult goat's somatic cells, gave birth to twins Wednesday in the capital of northwest China's Shaanxi Province.

There is no record of a cloned goat becoming pregnant, said Professor Wang Qianghua with the cloning project.

 

Yangyang was the second goat in the world cloned by Chinese scientists from adult somatic cells, following the first one, Yuanyuan, which died only 36 hours after birth due to respiratory failure.

In cloning the goats, Chinese scientists adopted a technique of nuclear transfer, which is different from that used to produce Dolly the sheep, the world's first cloned animal, born in 1997 in Scotland.

 

Although the 'collapsing clone paradox' became evident to eugenicists, evidence for my theory of necessary genetic pollution and environmental filler came to fore with this article written and part quoted from Zecharia Sitchin.

 

223 genes added to the human genome from nowhere ???

they say bacteria added 233 to the human complement ??

are geneticists wrong ??

 

The Mystery of Adam's 'Alien'Genes

Send this article to a friend!

Feature Story FATE Magazine 2001-07-01

by Zecharia Sitchin http://www.fatemag.com

Zecharia Sitchin, born in Russia and raised in Palestine, is a noted archaeological scholar and author.

 

The biological evidence abounding in nature points convincingly to evolution. The fossil evidence reveals a succession of primates and hominids evolving over millions of years. The archaeological evidence shows a progression from an Old Stone Age to a Middle Stone Age, from early hominids to more advanced ones. Were it not for an unexplained gap (the Missing Link) of a sudden progression not over millions of years but all at once that resulted in Homo sapiens ...'

The discovery that all life on Earth consists of the same genetic

elements, DNA and its four nucleotide letters known by their initials A-C-G-T, and that genetically man differs from chimpanzee by just one percent of their genomes ...'

But if one is to accept a tentative explanation for a group of enigmatic and extraordinary genes that humans possess, the feat of fashioning the Adam was achieved by a group of bacteria.

 

The sequencing of the human genome accomplished in June 2000, and the more recent identification of man's 30,000-plus genes (the groups of letters that express proteins), appear to uphold the theory of evolution.

Scientists have been able to trace the vertical genetic progression of life on Earth.

The same DNA that formed the first single-celled organisms some four billion years ago raised a tree of life through bacteria, fungi, plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates, all the way to the epitome-modern human beings. Indeed, the findings announced by the Public Consortium and the private Celera group in February 2001 were characterized as humbling.

Our genes number little more than double those of the fruit fly (13,601), and barely 50 percent more than the roundworm (19,098).

But within the data there looms a mystery that goes to the heart of the evolution-versus-creation dispute-and, unintentionally, the discovery offers corroboration of ancient myths about the role of extraterrestrials in bringing us about.

While confirming the evolutionary process genetically, by tracing a vertical progression from the simplest to the more complex, the new findings came up with what Science (February 16, 2000) termed a head-scratching discovery.

The human genome contains 223 genes that do not have the

required predecessors on the genomic evolutionary tree.

How did man acquire this group of enigmatic genes?

In the evolutionary progression from bacteria to invertebrates to

vertebrates and finally to modern humans, these 223 genes are completely missing in the invertebrate phase. Therefore, the scientists explain their presence in the human genome by a rather recent [in evolutionary time scales] probable horizontal transfer from bacteria.

In other words, at a relatively recent time as evolution goes, modern humans acquired an extra 223 genes-not through gradual evolution, not vertically on the tree of life-but horizontally, as an insertion of genetic material from bacteria.

Now, at first glance it would seem that 223 genes is no big deal. In fact, while every single gene makes a great difference to every individual, 223 genes make an immense difference to a species such as ours.

The human genome is made up of about three billion nucleotides (the letters A-C-G-T, which stand for the initials of the four nucleic acids that spell out all life on Earth). Just over one percent of these are grouped into functioning genes (rather than the almost five percent earlier assumed). The difference between one individual person and another amounts to about one letter in a thousand in the DNA alphabet. The difference between man and chimpanzee is less than one percent. (One percent of 30,000 is 300.)

An analysis of the functions of these genes through the proteins that they spell out, conducted by the Public Consortium and published in the journal Nature, shows that they include not only proteins involved in important physiological and psychiatric functions, but also important neurological enzymes that stem only from the mitochondrial portion of the DNA-the so-called Eve DNA humankind inherited through the mother-line all the way back to a single original 'Eve'. [Nature, New Scientist]

 

How sure are the scientists that such important and complex genes, such an immense human advantage, was obtained by us-rather recently-through the courtesy of infecting bacteria?

It is a jump that does not follow current evolutionary theories, said Steven Scherer, director of mapping of the Human Genome Sequencing Center at the Baylor College of Medicine.

We did not identify a strongly preferred bacterial source for the

putative horizontally transferred genes, states the report in Nature. The Public Consortium team, conducting a detailed search, found that 113 genes out of the 223 are widespread among bacteria, though they are entirely absent in invertebrates. An analysis of the proteins which the enigmatic genes express showed that out of 35 identified, only 10 had counterparts in other vertebrates, ranging from cows to rodents to fish; 25 of the 35 were unique to humans.

It is not clear whether the transfer was from bacteria to human or from human to bacteria, Science quoted Robert Waterson, co-director of Washington University's Genome Sequencing Center, as saying.

But if man gave those genes to bacteria, where did man acquire those genes to begin with?'  [Sitchin Z,  2001]

 

From ???@??? Sat Mar 13 231008 1999

To Conspiracy Theory Research List <CTRL@LISTSERV.AOL.COM

From Andrew Hennessey <pegasus@easynet.co.uk

Subject Re [CTRL] Hennessey & Free Energy

 

While a  "free-energy" device would certainly be a good proof of

Hennessey's theory other means may be sufficient. Prediction of certain phenomena which cannot be explained now would be good, though may not be sufficient. If you could predict reactions at the quantum level more efficiently than at present, that might be a good start. As Hoffa said "provide physical evidence that is valid".

 

Some Predictions of Hennessey's 'Unifying Theory' 1976/91,99

 

·        time is Non-Linear.

·        matter and energy are absolutely fractal and non-linear.

·        there is no perfect physical form e.g. platonic forms are psychological wishes.

·        A particle is both a particle and a wave at the same time.

·        quantum theory and superstring theory need extreme revision

·        the big bang was local and not that big.

·        every kind of knowledge imaginable is 'a posteriori or at best synthetic a priori'.

·        there is NO 'a priori' knowledge except 'first cause'.

·        the cosmos of light matter can be entirely depicted with a universal wave theory.

·        Hawkings was wrong when he said the cosmos is non-linear only at black holes.

·        Einstein was wrong to accept no aether and fix ‘c’.

·        There is No Higgs massless vector Boson.

·        The Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum physics is wrong.

·        5th generation artificial intelligence is possible.

·        teleology is a valid science and can be empirically modelled.

·        A set of Logically Complete Essences is a VALID assertion.

·        mass and time and gravity are related in direct proportions.

·        energy and time are related in inverse proportions.

·        Certain elements will drift through other elements.

·        there is DNA based life all over the Cosmos.

·        DNA structure is an innate property of Chaos and emergence.

·        The second law of thermodynamics is not Universal - No Heat Death in the Big Bang.

·        In cosmological context, matter Can be created and destroyed in contradiction of Newton.

·        telepathic processes have a rational model within the Phil. of Mind.

·        There will be no Big Crunch - or Universal Collapse.

·        Tons of problems science thinks of as Paradoxes aren't really paradoxes at all .. e.g. Collapsing Clone Paradox.

 

TRIPARTITE  ESSENTIALISM  ABSTRACT

 

a.  The 3'ness Metaphysics and Assertions.

 

1.      The Cosmos is in a state of flux.

 

2.      A transfer of energy between two points or systems via a common intervening medium is a process called Osmosis. [a Universal state of affairs i.e. some A to some B through some common C]

 

3.      The most basic and tautologically true of an infinite number of transfers of energy in the Cosmos of 3 dimensions of space and one of time is between two systems.

 

4.      This basic transfer can be modeled in several ways.

 

a.  Osmosis. i.e. The diffusion of a high concentration to an area of lower concentration through a semi-permeable membrane also as Fajan's Rules of atomic Chemistry applied to the migration of electrons.

 

b.  As a metaphysically continuous extension of one system into another, where the second system 'Emerges' out of the potential created by the activity of the first. e.g. Morphogenetic Attractor [Langton C], Evolutionary Vacancy [Goodwin B] - as a Field in Psychology [Lewin K] and electricity [Ohm's Law, incorporating potential difference of energies as Voltage and resistance to the passage of energy from high to low potential.]

 

c.  The relationship between the two systems can be empirically modeled by an  inverse square power law i.e. The more one system increases in magnitude, the more the effect of the other system diminishes in turn. This can be more attenuated and imprecise at increasingly larger scales of relativity of mass.

 

d.  A binary and tripartite arithmetic, can be used to model this transaction, where system A, system B and the common medium system C  have a holistic relativity which can be represented as integrated or disintegrated in whole or part by 1's or 0's denoting on/off, extant/disabled [Boole G].

 

e.  At any time 1, there can be eight essential states of that Tripartite  Relativity. These 'essences' or 'atomic state descriptions' at time 2 can be any of the  other eight. The number of possibilities for  changes of state is modeled by a closed set of 64.

When the 64 transitions of state are tabulated by placing states of 

change in graded  relativity or chaos or non-structure in sequence 

with time, we end up with a metaphysical model of the activity of

elements in the periodic table of chemistry, where top left, the

reactive elements, bottom right the most structured, and in the

middle, transitional states which are complex.

Mathematical modeling of spontaneous emergence for artificial life experiments  [Langton 1992] with the same arithmetic criteria as  these essences produce the same Periodic Table of states.

   From this metaphysics can be derived an Octal Arithmetic with an    

   unusual concept of zero, for zero in this system has substance

   i.e. There is no absolute zero.

 

b.  Semantic model and Metalanguage for [T]

 

System1 is denoted 'Macro', it is the umbrella of basic constituents and energy source from which emerges an energy transfer. E.g. the Sun this energy is then processed by the intervening system, denoted 'Meso' which has Structure and Mechanics e.g. grass, and other biomass that acts on system2 e.g. cow, a grazer in the context of human farming and agriculture.  the grazer,  'Micro', which is the Evolutionary Asset or product of this chain of farming relativity. The cow is considered an evolutionary asset in some 'Context', e.g. human/sociological. This chain of relativity has given a general evolutionary opportunity for a herbivore.

 

f.  Dr Plichta's model of Tripartite Relativity ISBN 1-86204-014-1, pub element 1997 demonstrates that 3'ness is an archetypal and a priori state with the mathematics of prime numbers, and demonstrates that Structure emerges and evolves out of mathematical chaos.

 

5.  Order spontaneously emerges out of Chaos - a Natural Law

 

6.  The Cosmos and its energies are in a state of Chaos, and emerge systems that are ordered, but all energy and all matter and all time have the characteristics of Chaos - they are Non-Linear, both in the Macrocosm  and the Microcosm. [Schiffler's Horns paradox in mathematical topology.]

 

7.  The properties of emergence modeled here, are Telic. i.e.  end based and suggests that Emergence doesn't stop at causing system 2, but that successive systems emerge as part of an ongoing process.

 

8.  Entropy and demergence are part of this dualistic process of Emergence, construction and destruction, but it is suggested [Langton and Kauffman in Levy S.] that this process of expansion and contraction occurs around a tendency to equilibrium e.g. the elements of Chemistry tend to transitional equilibrium states. These states may also  be considered to be Complex states at the Edge of Chaos and the Edge of Structure and are self evolving and self-regulating.

 

9.   The 20th Century 'heresy' of a claim to Essences is that of unfalsifiable absolute truth of at least a synthetic a priori nature.

 

10.  There is a formal logic for the set of Essences producing various important languages; [T], [HX], [A], [G], [Ga],

 

11.  These are limited and closed sets of Logically Real 'atoms' that are event descriptions between time1 and time2. So-called 'essential numbering'.

 

 

 

 

THE TRIPARTITE PRINCIPLE.

 

From a set of simple rules, and using the strong analogies generated,  this holistic  paradigm proposes many  sought  after  answers - a way of seeing relativity and function in a holistic and also logical way.         

A Universal Ohm's Law and biological osmosis provide the model for all systems. All possess some bigger energy concentration donating to a lower energy concentration through the intermediacy of common medium of relativity.

 

From  within  an  umbrella  of  potential  e.g.  the   potential difference  between  one   site/event   and   another,   energy passes or diffuses or discharges from a site of higher energy to  one of lower energy and by that process creating the potential  for another emergent system.

We must first formally classify  Tripartite  Essentialism  within  the Philosophy of Science.

 

Tripartite Essentialism is based upon the field theory notion that there is a continuous relation  between  one  system  and  another through a common medium. i.e. A to B through some common C.

To add to this idea is the notion of Emergence,  where one more massivebut  less sophisticated system by its more massive scales of chaos(ether) in a higher energy state feeds into and - [emerges] another more sophisticated system in our time space.

This is accomplished by the transference  of  energy  from  the lesser evolved system to a site  of  competition  with  another system in the same context.

 

The product of this transference of energy or discharge is some system or artefact that is said to have emerged or  filled  the vacancy created by evolution  and competition.

In  America  at  the  Santa  Fe   Institute,   the   biological implications of this 'vacancy'  were labelled  as  'Morphogenetic Attractors'.

This discharge or current occurs through a medium which  offers resistance. There are three broad types of discharge from high to low energy.

 

The 'electricity'  of  this  discharge  varies  in [T] as the 3 teleological classes of material complexity; where;

 

1.      the alpha class i.e. idioms 1-3 convey energy as ether and  

photons,

2.  the beta class i.e. idioms 4&5  where  energy is bound up in and invested in mechanics of an  organic  nature and the  'electricity'  of  the  discharge  between  two  poles becomes invested in systems more  teleologically  sophisticated than a mere trail of electrons. e.g. water, ions and hydrocarbons etc.

3.  The gamma  class,  idioms  6-8, employ the two previous types of  'Voltage'  but  also  includes the additional  teleological  sophistication  of  energy  being further abstracted and manipulated  by  types  of social artefact  or information systems.

 

Easily measured in a  simple  format  -  as  electricity,  this tripartite format  is  known and measured  in  more  complex,  compound  and crystallised (telic) energy substrates and organised and self regulating aggregates of matter - e.g. in  psychological  systems, which are relatively abstract systems  (in  comparison  with  a copper wire), the discharge of motivation has been measured  by Lewin [1925] - unconsciously using a Tripartite principle.

Kurt  Lewin  has  developed  this  as  a   'Field   Theory   in Psychology'.

 

The case for  Tripartite  Essentialism  in  the  Philosophy  of Science is presented as follows:

The trigram is  a  basic  representation  of  a  metaphysically continuous relationship between any two systems:  denoting  the validity of a discharge of energy in a transcation between one system of a  higher, to another of a lower potential through a common substrate.

 

Whatever the symbol set used to denote the three categories - it can be a whole line or broken line, 1 or 0 or some other;  The  upper  line is to  be denoted   Macro which represents the origin of the  discharge:  from  the  most  basic ingredients or substrate.

 

The middle line, denoted Meso, represents the substrate through which the discharge takes place, a system  more  developed  than the macro, but less emergent in sophistication than  the  Micro. The structure and mechanics of any interstitial process capitalise on and are ontologically driven by the contextual and environmental discharge into the site of systemic evolutionary activity. - the Micro.

 

The Micro, holistically extends and invests into some other Macro of another system in the context (Macro 2) with time.

This extension can be regarded as deterministic relativity in continuous operation - [cf. Fractal]  The evolutionary result is a system that has adapted from the first system - but contextually related to the emergent needs of a second system that may have created superior impact, stresses, demands and emergence to the first context (Macro1) in time.

 

The Micro, the bottom trigram or third line, represents the site of discharge of the Macro1. It is either a more teleologically sophisticated  ergonomic  system  and structure which emerges and evolves to exploit macro2 in an adjacent system of similar context or better adapted and smaller disintegrated products of macro1 subject to superior forces from Macro2, but better adapted to the new Macro2.

 

The field relativity between macro1 and macro2 can be described by  a power law called the inverse square law   U @ 1/R

The more the power and influence of Macro1 increases, the more the power and influence of Macro2 decreases. etc.

 

This power square law, is a unifying and  universal  equation  seen  in;  gravity, particle  dynamics,  cycling   in   ecosystems   (predator/prey relativity),  deterioration  with  distance  of  all  sorts  of electromagnetic  phenomenon  in  three  dimensions,  and   most obviously described by electricians and physicists as Ohm's Law and by Chemists as Fajan's Rules.

In electrical equations, Volts, Ohms and Ampere's depict this transaction at a fairly simple level of molecular investment, mass, scale and complexity.

Where  V  or  voltage  represents   the   energy   potential difference between macro1 and macro2. across which a discharge, exchange or transference flows from higher to lower energy values.

 

R, represents the resistance of the intervening  substrate, (meso)  to the passage of the discharge , and the evolutionary asset (Micro) is the amount  of  energy  delivered  to  the  site  of competition  where evolution works itself out at the boundary between two different systems - The energy carried through system1 discharges at macro2. (I)

 

          MACRO=V, MESO=R, MICRO=I

 

In Biological conditions, this equation sounds like, 'If the V, food and conditions are  good,  the  physical  difficulties  of properties in the landscape R, i.e. its topography   disposition and systematic organisation etc. [meso], diminish :

then the evolutionary asset is an increased population I.

The flow from high to low across a common mediating and impeding middle can be easily modeled.

 

There follows a Sentential Logic depiction of the formation of Tripartite Essences and their possibilities for evolutionary modeling along the lines of the power law.

 

The macro is the substrate S from which the discharge towards emergence E occurs in the context T of time and space.

At the next telic level of organisation, this extant ergonomic  system becomes aligned A  in  time  and  space  with  a  format evolved from S and the context T.

 

The system comprising S, A and T further evolves at t2, when it; competes, emerges and improves its emergence E  parameters  Ez  in  context T, or fails. The establishment of a new transfer gradient by alignment to a new evolutionary pathway A at the expense of old emergence pathway E.

The Macro Substrate and context is combining emergence product E with A in some time T to get Ez.

 

 

 

          Context (time)     T   (t1)      where  [ T and not T = RAA]

 

         

      New Substrate     S, (-S) ->  (A @ E)

          New Alignment    A, (-A) ->  (E) v (Ez) at Delta T

          Emergence           E, (-E) ->  (Ez) v (T) v (-A) v (S) v (-S) v (-T)

          at Delta T

 

The  basic  trigram  and  context denote the system and its transaction  to have or have not  structural  identity  whenever the underlying function is valid in relation  to  the context.

i.e. some form of competition  may disintegrate the function of the system's 3 new attributes :

i.e.  (Sx,  Ay,  Ez)  have  structural integrity, and (S,A,E) do not -

 

The eight essential states can be generated from  synthesis  of the

 'a priori'  diagrams.

          T, (time/context).

 

        S     S      S       S      Sx    Sx    Sx    Sx

        A     A      Ay     Ay     A      A     Ay    Ay

        E     Ez     E      Ez     E      Ez     E     Ez

 

 

Where E is  either  Emergent  or  Demergent  evolutionary asset depending  on  the Competitive process with respect to the context delta T.

i.e. (t1 - t2).

Modeling of the Boolean descriptions by this type of metalanguage can bring concepts represented within this knowledge representation system into the realms of mathematical computational logic.

Whereas before, semantics belonged in the world of the arbitrary with very little relation between 'sign and thing signified', whole diverse domains of knowledge could thus be empirically charted using the [T] transaction model and relate the world of domain labels to the empirical measurements of success or lack of it within the transference gradient.

 

The [T] Knowledge Representation System, more fully described later is called the Tripartite Relativity (Essentialism) Expert System or [TREES].

 

In natural language, the concepts of; 'object', 'doing' a 'qualitative descriptor' can also be translated into this metaphysical system.

The Linguistic tuple of noun, verb and adjective  are also  directly related to the Tripartite Essentialist  ideological  framework:

where macro is the noun, that is, the ingredients'  system  and its fabric. meso would be the verb, that is how the  fabric  is deployed in an active and  existential  sense,  and  the  micro would be the  adjective,  that  is  how  the  system  would  be depicted, its qualitative performance in relation to some other system macro2.

 

The compilation of a periodic table of relative activity of states, between highly active, transitional and diverse, to most stable can be achieved here also.

Other modeling by Langton C, and Kauffman S, demonstrate the emergence of complex self regulating systems amongst transitional states. [Levy S, pub. Penguin 1993, ISBN 0-14-023105-6, pages 108-112 & 135-137]

 

at time1

000, 001, 010, 011, 100, 101, 110, 111 depict all the states of functional integrity, however there are 8 times 8 possible state descriptions with time.

 

Eg.  000  000  000  000   000   000  000    000

        000  001  010  011   100   101  110    111

 

       001  001  001  001   001    001  001   001

       000  001  010  011   100    101  110   111

 

       010  010  010  010   010    010  010   010

       000  001  010  011   100    101  110   111 ..... etc

 

[there are 64 such sixes within this Closed and Limited set.]

 

 This Logically and Formally  Complete set of functional relativity as events: can be depicted as a Periodic Table  of  Energies  [PTE] and as a simple model of the presence of chaos and structure - (it could be a simple 'Instrumentalist analogy' cf. Dulhem, [1952] to the Periodic table of Chemistry) etc.

Transitional self-regulating complex activity within interstitial states in such processes of change within chaos and structure were also modeled in Biology by Langton, Kauffman and Goodwin.

 

The synthesis upon 'a priori'  fact in Tripartite Essentialism is  a Phenomenological event in the world of labels, but the essential  relativity  of  such events within the physical objects themselves belongs to a Logically  Complete  and  closed  set  of  relativistic functions  - and those functions  are  responsible for the fact of the

noun and its ingredients.

 

The epistemological status of Tripartite Relativity and its one basic field 'law' i.e. the inverse square law, that ties it into the operation of 'natural' and universal processes, comes from a continuous tautological relation between the components of the 3part system and their context: a discontinuous  relation  in this sense is a reductio, since it implies  no  relativity  and hence no measurement or phenomenon. i.e.  relativity is 'a priori' valid.

 

All materials generated by  Tripartite  Essentialist  formalism belong  to  the  one  basic  set  of  64  atomic  events  which physically increment by gradual 64 transitions to the  greatest level of structure at 64.

 

Tripartite Essentialism incorporates  a  field law, where a powers system is in continuous relation.

In metaphysics, to categorise Tripartite Essentialism with the three main classical types of individual metaphysical distinction, produces a bit  of  a  quandry, for [TRE] embraces all three types.

The set of 64 Essential events and members are constituted Parmenidean individuals: changeless, permanent entities.  The atomic stance that entails from this is that change can only come through their rearrangement.

The Heraclitean (phenomenalist) and Aristotelian aspects of Tripartite Essentialism come from the Emergent and Demergent properties of energy, structure and chaos: -  where  Heraclitean arrangements of the Parmenidean  (atomic)  set  of  64  can  be fleeting and ephemeral, or persist longer (Aristotle).

 

The emergence of 'structures for nothing' from the Heraclitean 'fires' as it were is described by  the  generative  theory  of causality.

Where the cause is supposed to have the power to generate the effect and is connected to it.

 

Such cause in [TRE] has a natural law of emergence observable in a continuous field as an internal relation.

 

Whereas the succession theory of causality would hold that the phenomena observed are psychological synthesis, the 'a  priori'  element of  the  Tripartite  atom  creates  a  real  connection between cause and effect and that this can be identified  by  a causal mechanism

e.g. using Ohm's Law, a  light  bulb,  and  the application of a potential difference in  energy  relativity between the filament.

 

The Primary quality of Tripartite Essentialism [T] is energy transaction.

 

The ergonomic status of all systems, universally, is not fixed and is subject to arbitrary change or the rearrangement of the sets of atoms and processes that comprise the system.

The phenomenon of change gives rise to the secondary qualities associated with the Primary quality of flux.

 

For example the primary quality of Ohms Law electricity generates the secondary quality of light and heat. In  [T] the primary quality of the universal energy power law of mass generatesthe secondary quality of gravity and time.

 

The emergent properties of flux can be defined in terms of: the property of the whole being produced by the properties of the parts, and that these emergent holistic properties derive from the whole structure and its context.

 

 

The Importance of  Analogy.

 

Immanuel Kant, whose flawed 19th Century Critique of Teleology did not recognise that Biological systems had an  intrinsic  physical order that was part of the one basic ergonomic and evolutionary hierarchy - drew the line of demarcation between the  'a priori'  knowledge of  physics  and  mathematics  and  the  messy  biological stuff, whose aesthetic appeal seemed  to  delude  us into  thinking  that   it   all   made   properly   constituted  mathematical sense simply because we had an expectation that it did so.

Analogy,  however  can model such fuzzy logic messes.

Osmosis can be used as an analogous modeling strategy for transference at all levels of material complexity from the atomic rules of Fajan, the electronic rules of Ohm, to the psychological rules of Lewin.

Osmosis is a biological term used to describe the active transport of salts from an area of high concentration to an area of low concentration through a semi-permeable membrane.

The basic premise is that any system is a 'membrane' between two others. This Meso role identifies the membrane as the attenuating artefact in the [T] transaction process.

The structure and mechanics of which pass on the 'discharge' to the site of systemic competition.

Energy flowing into or being fed into the locus of components that  comprise  a  Tripartite  system  finds  a condition of impedence to its flow; where the original stream becomes  transmuted or metabolised into those substances or effects which  maintain the system's function, whether biological or physical.

Given a consistent, qualitative flow, the structure can specialise on the resources of its input to exploit systems ever more different and incongruous to the energy system from which it emerged.  This factor is  dependent  on  the  stress imposed externally at the  site  of  competition  between  this system and its context and the competing context into which the ergonomic 'discharge' is directed - for example in the story of the prehistoric evolution of amphibians  where  the  developing  respiratory mechanism  of the organism enabled the exploitation of new habitat and context on  the  shore  -  this  adaptation, initially, may have often failed under the critical  stress of lack of humidity and high temperature.

In using biological concepts as tools to interpret more general physical systems, it becomes easier to visualise Tripartite systems living in habitats, eating, metabolising and competing in a world readily accessible to the senses, and in this way, the energy that is being processed and competed  for, may be more easily tracked in terms of a  biological  analogy  through the very accessible concept of organic holism.

 

A system becomes a system when a group of components are used consistently to receive and process energy.  If consistency develops, it is because there is a context or input that caters for the collective needs of this group of components.

In the macrocosm, e.g. in a fish, after feeding, the organs metabolise the input and distribute the metabolites to every part of the organisation and organism where they are used in the process of growth, competition or maintenance.

Speaking more abstractly; this structure and mechanics or, supporting  mechanism or metabolism,  is   an   energy-distribution  infrastructure, as often seen in civilisation as it  is  at  the  superphysical level. [Smith A, 'An enquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations, 1776] where fine tuning of a welfare (public interest) economics strategy with the systemization of economic and industrial benefits around the strategies of the open market allegedly produced a viable society. Industry and Society and Individuals who obtained the most benefit for the least cost allegedly would be 'selected for' in terms of a social and biological Darwinism. i.e.

A selection of the most efficient organisation. (as opposed to organism).

In treating Civilisation as part of the set of Organic Holism, it too has a brick and mortar body powered by the metabolite of electricity obtained in the competitive jungle of Capitalism.

The context of a Civilisation is its minerals, resources and materials and the processing capacity of the system itself is dependent on the efficiency of emergent tools, artefacts, processes and information with which raw  materials are exploited  e.g.  farming, mining, factory and   processing technology.

The 'heart' of the nuclear reactor, pumps sustenance along  the veins and arteries of its power cables, and  cognisant ganglia of  the stock  exchanges   allocate lines of  trade and communication, where secondary Capital metabolites are  shipped through the enormous organic system of the infrastructure in a quest for sustained growth and competition for available resources according to stimulii or Labour Market Intelligence.

As in a biological system, the technological system processes and reprocesses  raw  input  through  a  chain  of  useful  and cumulative effects, investing  time,  capital  and  utility in  these metabolic products.

The evolutionary  assets  of  a  Civilisation  are  information based, where the management and control  of  information  leads  through policy and science to the maximisation of  output,  for the minimum of input.

Sustained growth and metabolism,  a  necessity  in   an  entropic

environment can only be maintained by the maximisation of inputs as a whole, and since the natural and universal power law is involved in the demographic and ergonomic cycles  of  growth and  decay,  the  exponential  demand  on  resources  made by exponential consumption can only be maintained by  correct  and competitive scientific advance.

At this level of complexity, the Osmosis analogy includes many more sets of artefacts, systems and formats into which the energy discharge of the context macro has been encoded.

Here are a few more examples of 'Tripartite Relativity' .

 

Three parts and a context.

i.e. Context and  Macro:  CMacro, Meso, Micro. that use analogies to describe systems both in general terms but also in physical and empirical terms. These ideas use the biological 'osmosis' model to illustrate the transaction process between high energy objects and systems to low energy objects and systems.

 

Food, has as its context the Sun, which powers the green cycle

whose Meso DNA and coding for systematic organism turns the available  Carbon,  Nitrogen  and  Phosphor  in the Macro into the Micro asset of Carbohydrate Sugars and Oxygen needed to sustain the plants. 

This series of trophic and vegetational cycles produce a complex ecosystem  and  food  web which becomes the macro that supplies components to another inhabitant, Man.

Man extracts for the benefits of the gastronomical structure and mechanics of  Man,  [his Meso] energy  packets  of  variable quality and quantity.

His kitchen receptacle, when examined holistically with Tripartite Relativity has a macro or function that suits it for the context of the kitchen in design and purpose.

The size of the bowl, the energy facility of the umbrella that it provides to sustain its utility - the macro or utility for the conveyance of fruit is dependent on the Man's social context.

The Meso of the bowl is basically its components and structural

constituents, e.g. molecular and crystalline integrity and tolerance etc, and  the  Micro  of  the  bowl,  basically, its evolutionary assets are its  qualitative  aspects  e.g.  if  the purpose of the bowl was solely general utility, then plastic is an asset to enable continuity  of  function;  if  however,  its quality is not selecting it to attain conditions  of  continual use e.g. porcelain bowl at a banquet  may  be  more  acceptable, then the Micro of the bowl is dependent on  context  conditions both qualitative and social  and the amount of psychological pressure its system can  'bring to bear' or weather in the selection process.

The cupboard should, like the bowl, be seen in terms of the function that makes it a specific type of cupboard, and not necessarily seen in terms of the energies of its manufacture.

The cupboard is the end product (Micro) of  a  Sawmill  (Meso) that manufactures to differing qualities from forests (Macro).

The context of the cupboard per se would be its overall capacity to perform its container function of holding utensils e.g. bowl.

Its Meso would be its structural arrangements and partitioning and fitments and the evolutionary assets or qualitative aspects - Micro, would be the social and physical qualitative difference between Oak and MDF Hardboard, and the structural tolerances and aesthetic qualities of plastic and brass.

A record player has a Macro of electricity, capital and the context and  function of an information transformer.

The Meso or structure and mechanics of the hardware, its choice of; materials; circuit boards, their relative component complexity and arrangements, and additional attenuations, options and facility would also have a qualitative aspect Micro, both in social status and end product of HiFi.

A Book or other Media process, has as its context its topic, and a Macro also determined by the available information and physical formats and ingredients of its social source. Its Meso, or structure and mechanics are the ideologies or idea formats that collate and relate and present and explain the general relativity of the social artefact or information tool to its social context.

Whereas the evolutionary asset of the book, its Micro, would be how effective and intelligent an ideological tool it was for the exploitation of the  resources of  the context to which its main premise was applied.

A  lampost  has as its social context, the illumination of infrastructure for the purposes of efficient society  etc,  and as a Macro both the  capital  of  taxation  and  the power  of electricity and the facilitation of orderly social conduct, its Meso is the structure and  components  of  the object itself, its concrete or metal, its wiring system and lighting components, and its qualitative aspects are mainly aesthetic in relation to how much light it provides, what colour, what morphology how socially designed, how high  and the quality of both structure and function.

A Home has as its context the housing of a family unit for the purposes of  labour maintenance  within  the context of the infrastructure - the family or Macro will maintain the input of capital, fuel, energies, supermarkets, reservoirs, petrol, and these will be utilised by the structure and  mechanics  of the social context, Meso,  its market efficiency, its learning and reproductive and creative potential and the degree of intelligence and efficiency  to be invested in and deployed in maintaining and sustaining the fabric and quality of the social environment. 

The Qualitative aspects of home are related to capital input, class and other types of ideology of social fabric and aesthetic that enable evolution, expansion and successful stress free growth for the most benefit from the least cost. [Smith A, 1776]

 

These prior examples are capable of  being  mechanised  by a simple algebraic format which can illustrate the  relationships of integrity or disintegrity involved in these nested systems and their internal and external exchanges.

This example is of a simple Homeostatic mechanism dependent on the  qualitative aspects  of  the  competitive  Micro  in  its exploitation of the Context  from  which  it  is  deriving  its sustenance.

The example illustrates  how  the  'World'  refines  itself  to provide the context in which a (fish) may evolve ..

 

The world,  made  up  of  many  components  representing  land;

elements and variously derived systems that will contribute  to

the  oceanic  system.  From  this  Pedosphere,  rivers   drain,

precipitation of solvents, boundaries of various mineral strata

and  rocks  etc  mark  the  junction  or  estuary   where   the concentrated presence of all the microfactors that feed the sea is sent to provide the ingredients or context for our fish.

In effect, the coast has acted like a vast membrane between the context of the land and the context of the sea.

From which, the various factors and co-factors  useful  to  the

promotion and creation of an  evolutionary vacancy for the fish

precipitate  into  the  ocean  from  another  exogenous  system

 (Unified at a global organic level by an interdependency of the

same components eg. Carbon, Oxygen,  Nutrient  Minerals, Water etc.)

The  diluting  body  of   water   separates   from   the   high

concentration of salts, biomass,  bases  etc  injected  by  the

rivers, the substances that will  provide  in  some  form,  the

energy source of the fish.

This input is further processed by other organic and  inorganic

processes in the ocean - and some  factors  eg.  salts  may  be

bound  up  by  Calcium  Sulphate  in  Plankton   and   may   be

precipitated out of the system as sediment, or,  these  factors

may be consumed and passed, usefully processed, to  some 

other  tier of the food chain.

At this stage, the original microfactors may have  found  their

way into the  production  of  many  useful  nutrients  and  co-

factors. These may either contribute to the food factors in the macro of the fish, or may be  precipitated  out  through  other

cycles less useful to the context and environment of the fish.

 

A similar complexity of changes is reflected in  the  algebraic

model. This takes the algebraic model as a useful archetype, for an input  process output box, the Universal IPO box, it may again

be applied to the system of the fish..

The energy source of the fish is the system of  microfactors

supplied by the land, sifted and specialised to augment its life  -

or death.

Where these factors become the energy source  of  the fish, the organism itself has a demand  for  those  ingredients and  products  it  has  evolved  with.  The  organism is thus surrounded by or has evolved into  that  immediate  environment which  can  fulfill  its  needs.   (That environment is a Morphogenetic Attractor).

The Macro  of  the  fish,  then,  supplies  the  structure  and

mechanics (Meso)  with  the  nutrients  that  it  is  currently

evolved  to  process; and through  various  energy   exchange

mechanisms or meso's/membranes  or  biochemical pathways,  the essence of what is vital for life, evolution and adaptation is conveyed  in  various  stages  to  the Micro, where those evolutionary assets are employed or cancelled in the struggle with the context environment (Q).

The following narrative relates the behaviour of the  algebraic

model with reference to syntax.

1.  The  niche  that  provides  the  context  to  contain  this

organism/organisation/system is represented by various  

factors or groups of letters.

Those factors directly used by the organism are ASB(E) or  food

and energy input to the Energy Gathering Mechanism VN.

2.  The Meso - processing E (Evolutionary Advantage) for use at Q.   ASB takes E - Evolutionary Advantage forward.

 3.  Paying a toll of (B) at a membrane (P) for the furtherance of AS(E).

4.  The toll (B), paid, mechanism P -  the site of the toll brings and enables a carrier mechanism RV(T) to bind AS(E) and convey it down pathways that demand it.

5.  Part (T) of RV(T) can only take AS(E)  forward  if it can locate its  binary  receptor  mechanism  RV(Y).  T  and  Y  are mutually attracted, however Y  is a resource which is only produced when the organism as a whole is competing well with  'exogeny' i.e. the contect at factor Q - where Q is a chaotic energy demand that affects the integrity of organism Z.

6. Thus when Z is doing well, Y enables the progress of AS(E).

Y represents the potential exhaustion  has  to  debilitate  the

organism to a  state  of  extinction,  making  the  quality  of

substance of Z, reserves etc. an important factor in  surviving

the competitive stress of Q.

Q on the other hand represents the freedom of external  factors to interfere with the evolution of a system.

With Y present, AS(E) is taken to and bonded to mechanism W  which further filters out RV.

 

7.  The  number  of  exchanges  from  one  mechanism to another represent, here, the  increasing  complexity  which  binds  and  processes, refines  and  directs  food/energy  input  into  the

specialised compartment of the Micro which is interphasing 

with the environmental competition.

 

8.  'Food' factor  (AS)  is  then  expended  to  convey  (E)  -

Evolutionary Advantage to the Micro or Assets of the organism -  enabling Z to hold its own, And where Z has advantage  over  Q, it produces Y - its potential for continued survival.

 

This process of natural selection in terms of increased stress on the umbrella of systemic integrity may be illustrated at work within the algebriac model in the story of the dinosaur .. where supported  by  the  body  of energies that comprised the atmosphere and its trophic range  - under  this  umbrella it flourished, finding  a tolerable equilibrium  between  air  temperature, body temperature and energy consumption.

The dinosaur lost energy to the atmosphere in an exchange or toll paid at a comfortable rate.

When  the  climate  changed  and  the  air  grew  colder, the biological identity  of  the  reptile  could  not  support  the massive heat loss and the increased toll,  which  made  greater demands on its energy reserves than it could cope with.

With no new equilibrium between the cold weather and the biology of the dinosaur being possible the only other outcome was extinction. i.e, the toll  of  Q  was  too  much  for  Z to sustain.

This algebraic model can be used in conjunction with  6 keys systems theory – later described – to bring detail into Trinological classifications.

 

The use of analogy within Tripartite Essentialism is an important tool to overcome and  renegotiate old scientific models and old data such that they become more relevant and applicable to real life in the 21st century.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix 1. The Languages [A]  and  [T]

 

There are 729 states of [A] at time2. i.e. A to B through some common C with the intercession of (at least) a common D.

Minus the logically decided 64 states of [T]:

there are 729 delta T hexagrams i.e. time1 - 27 states times one of 27 at time2 = 729.  Modalities of  [A] 665 + [T] 64


examples of [A] trigrams            [T] trigrams

      

The 27 Trigrams of the Language [A] are also in the form: Macro, Meso, Micro -  A to B through some common C with the intercession of at least a common D.

 

   MACRO

   MESO

   MICRO

 

Appendix 2. THE LANGUAGE [A] 27, time1 Trigrams.


 

 

 

 


The 27 [A] time1 states are tripartite relativity of the form:

MACRO  [1, 0, 2]  - where 1 = on, 0 = off and 2 = transitional.

MESO     [1, 0, 2]

MICRO    [1, 0, 2]

 

 Appendix 3. The Octal Language [T] with no temporal Modalities (time2) - from disintegrity to integrity.